Okoratu wrote:
The scaling thing about rest moments being like typed out doesnt seem to make sense, it doesn't add anything. That's what it's supposed to state right now in the current criteria and is what gezo was saying - the breaks scale depending on tempo, writing out more values doesn't add information it's not written out to avoid running into this "oh my god there's 1500 hard set values in the RC that we have to follow now"
okay, but once again i bring up that the biggest motivation for this proposal is the fact that most people don’t really have any idea of how things scale when higher or lower than 180
that aside, assuming that those specifications were removed, would the new guideline be sufficient enough to accomplish the same sort of idea?