1. Hard (4,87 stars, 413 notes)
2. Insane (4,9 stars, 741 notes)
3. Luxo's Normal (2,79 stars, 190 notes)

Feverie wrote:

[Insane]

00:30:275 (2) - Slider Looks Ugly. When doing a Curve only use 3 Points. Make it a nicer curve! fixd curve a little
00:40:457 (8) - I think this Would look better just being Straight I wont change it, it looks nice with 9
00:55:002 (1) - Again make it look nicer! That slider is actually fine too : )

Vainslay wrote:

Insane Really enjoyed test playing it
You could tidy thing up a little though..

00:11:366 (1) - I would make this curve in a little (just to make it look better) Screen shot doesnt work : (

SPOILER

00:13:366 (8) - Instead try this. I found your long slider too long, and hitting an circle on that white tick is pleasantly better to the music. and the reverse felt meaningless But it's only my opinion. Nah, u are right, this is the only pattern that felt weird for me, will change it
Your old pattern~
and my suggestion from 00:13:184
00:24:093 (2) - remove note. move the new 2 ( or formally 3) 0.8x away from one, but as far away from 3 to create that jump ( and to be similar to 00:27:184 (3,4) - later on) I will stay with my pattern here, mainly because 0,8x - 3,2x DS changes will be too big where there are no big changes in music
01:03:730 (4) - NC both fixd
01:04:093 (1) - Remove New combo
02:10:638 (8) - NC nope
02:10:820 (1) - Remove NC
02:10:820 (1,2,3,4,5) - I would rearrange these notes Will stay with my traingle pattern : )

SPOILER

I'm hoping you understand the screen shot v.v

Well I guess that's only a few suggestions~ sorry

Jekate wrote:

hello
i just did a quick look on your map, why the Offset is -270?
i thought BPM:165 and Offset:1204 would be better

1. 01:01:093 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe it's just me who is bad at this but i really had trouble to play the 1/3. so maybe use sliders would be better? Besides all notes goes in pair so using 3 1/3-long sliders instead of 6 notes still fits the music pretty well. Same for 02:15:275 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7).
2. 01:37:548 - You forgot a note here.

1. 00:07:366 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think this part would play better if the slider were more spaced from each other. Because when you play it you're barely moving at all since you mostly stay on the head of each slider and move onto the next one which is very close every beat. And since the song is powerful and you don't stream you expect to move more than this. For example you spaced them more at 00:20:093 (1,2,3,4,5) or 01:56:093 (1,2,3,4).
2. 00:34:639 (1,3) - Small overlap you can easily avoid.
3. 00:44:093 (3) - Move it to x=276 y=208. The song is more and more intense here and since you have a jump from 00:43:366 (1) to 00:43:730 (2) why not continuing with 3 and 4 too?
4. 00:45:548 (3,3) - These notes are so powerful it felt weird to play them easily like this at the end of a stream. That's why i would suggest to turn the streams into this:
   
   With a jump between each slider and notes. Same for 01:24:639 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and 02:38:820 (1,2,3,1,2,3).
5. 00:47:730 (5) - ^ same for 02:41:184 (1).
6. 00:52:093 (3,5) - Same as 00:34:639 (1,3)
7. 00:55:548 (2,3,4) - CTRL+G it will flow better with 1 and 5!
8. 00:57:366 (5,6,7,8) - These notes are more powerful than those just before them so i would suggest to increase the sapcing of the jumps here.
9. 01:50:457 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think you could have done better than copy pasting the same pattern 4 times in a row. 2 times is ok but not 4! Besides with 6 notes and a slider with reverse you have A LOT of pattern possible! Use yur immagination!
10. 01:57:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - 1/3 + HIGH spacing + Notes not really easy to hear while playing = This is a pain to play! I hugely suggest to change this pattern because it's really not pleasant to play. Same for 02:45:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13).
11. 02:06:275 (3,5) - Same as 00:34:639 (1,3)
12. 02:09:730 (2,3,4) - Same as 00:55:548 (2,3,4)

rezoons wrote:

Hi ,

Mod from my queue,

[Diff]
Rhythm

1. 01:01:093 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe it's just me who is bad at this but i really had trouble to play the 1/3. so maybe use sliders would be better? Besides all notes goes in pair so using 3 1/3-long sliders instead of 6 notes still fits the music pretty well. Same for 02:15:275 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7). I know that players dislike 1/3 circle streams because of losing accuracy on it. around 50% of 1/3 streams are sliders already, I dont need more
2. 01:37:548 - You forgot a note here. actually that 2/1 break fits better (especially on stack)

Placement/Aesthetic

1. 00:07:366 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think this part would play better if the slider were more spaced from each other. Because when you play it you're barely moving at all since you mostly stay on the head of each slider and move onto the next one which is very close every beat. And since the song is powerful and you don't stream you expect to move more than this. For example you spaced them more at 00:20:093 (1,2,3,4,5) or 01:56:093 (1,2,3,4). Right, fixd it, spaced them more by using "scale..." option
2. 00:34:639 (1,3) - Small overlap you can easily avoid. fixd
3. 00:44:093 (3) - Move it to x=276 y=208. The song is more and more intense here and since you have a jump from 00:43:366 (1) to 00:43:730 (2) why not continuing with 3 and 4 too? true, fixd and fixd 6 as well cuz it looked a little ugly ;d
4. 00:45:548 (3,3) - These notes are so powerful it felt weird to play them easily like this at the end of a stream. That's why i would suggest to turn the streams into this:
   
   With a jump between each slider and notes. Same for 01:24:639 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and 02:38:820 (1,2,3,1,2,3). Its not bad idea, I know what u meant and that kind of jump can fit there, but im not fan of 1/4 slider + circle combo, but I will keep in mind this if I will get more suggestions.
5. 00:47:730 (5) - ^ same for 02:41:184 (1). But here I will definitely wont agree, big spacing changes there will be very confusing for players
6. 00:52:093 (3,5) - Same as 00:34:639 (1,3) ^
7. 00:55:548 (2,3,4) - CTRL+G it will flow better with 1 and 5! True, fixd
8. 00:57:366 (5,6,7,8) - These notes are more powerful than those just before them so i would suggest to increase the sapcing of the jumps here. fixd, increased spacing to 2,0x
9. 01:50:457 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think you could have done better than copy pasting the same pattern 4 times in a row. 2 times is ok but not 4! Besides with 6 notes and a slider with reverse you have A LOT of pattern possible! Use yur immagination! fixd, changed 2 last patterns
10. 01:57:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - 1/3 + HIGH spacing + Notes not really easy to hear while playing = This is a pain to play! I hugely suggest to change this pattern because it's really not pleasant to play. Same for 02:45:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13). That spacing isnt really big comparing to 1/4 streams. There are ppl who love 1/3 and 1/4 streams combo and ppl who hate it, Im part of these first ones : P
11. 02:06:275 (3,5) - Same as 00:34:639 (1,3) ^
12. 02:09:730 (2,3,4) - Same as 00:55:548 (2,3,4) hmm, here it breaks flow for me

Whoah, i remember you made me mod your first map and it was..... Well this map is really cool to play! I think aesthetics and flow can be improved in some part but overall i really liked the map and had fun playing it (song is awesome too)! Good job

Tidek wrote:

(btw i didnt know that some1 except me can give you kds, u already had it when i checked your mod Oo)

Oracle wrote:

Hi~
From my queue
They're all suggestions, feel free to not apply them but tell me the reason so I get better next time_(:з」∠)_


General
this song is from album <弦奏無彩色>. So you should add 'gen sou musaishoku' into source.
also add piano into tags. both added

Insane
00:00:639 (1) -00:00:639 (1) - Add a whistle on the tail. done
00:00:639 (1,2) - I don't think anti jump from the very begining is a good idea. Try Ctrl+G with the slider. Was trying to do that before and it didnt look good, that mini anti jump fits a lot better with piano and its isnt hard too (comparing to the rest of difficulty)
00:00:639 (1) - ^ probably u made mistake with copy/paste, but ik what u meant, added whistle on slider tail
00:05:911 (1,2,3,4) - What about make it a curve like this? too many loops, but fixd that pattern a little

SPOILER

00:12:820 (4) - Add drum clap just like 00:11:366 (1,2,3) - fixd
00:13:366 (8) - ^ on the slider head. finish fits better here
00:12:639 (2,3,4) - Try using less these similar patterns, abuse of them plays boring imo.You can put different patterns for streams by using different spacing.
00:13:911 (1,2) - Try ctrl+G,flows better. agree, fixd
00:14:093 (2,4,6) -If you apply the above change.Then make 2,4,6 like this.So there will be 3 jumps with gradually increasing spacing! hmm, I will stay with overlaps here, they looks more pretty for me here, but I moved 3 more further because of above change.

SPOILER

00:15:366 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -As i mentioned before,try various patterns with these streams! actually that was my idea here to make them similar ;d
01:24:639 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^
00:24:275 (3) - 00:27:184 (3) - 00:31:366 (5) - 00:38:820 (5) - Places where a whistle may be good. added all (+1 more)
00:35:184 (3) - Maybe a soft finish here? Feels good to me. Drum clap fits better
00:44:093 (3,4,5,6,7) - stack note 4 to the previous slider end and decrease the jump? not agree with stack, but decreased jump a little

SPOILER

00:48:275 (7,8,9) - This sounds empty.Consider using sliders to fill it up? You need to change 7 into a note if you apply this.

SPOILER

01:11:730 (2,3,4) - ^ Similar stuff. Will consider this, its good idea, but i think there will be too many sliders
00:51:911 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I like this!:D
02:06:275 - copy & paste...Please avoid this in Insane diff. It's fine to use the same rhythm for similar part of song but at least change the pattern a bit. I copy pasted only that thing 02:06:093 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), rest is different in patterns
01:03:184 (1,2,3) - Reduce the spacing plz.It's much harder to follow than other jumps you put. Im really surprised that some1 complaining about that pattern. Increasing spacing every note and good flow its great idea and it fits very well there, its not very hard as well, because there are many harder jumps than this.
01:14:820 (1,2,3) - ^
02:13:366 (5,6,7) - move up 6 a bit. Current one looks ugly. fixd
things to point out in the second half is pretty much the same as the first one.So just refer to the above.(they're similar anyway)
02:48:457 (1,1,1) - too loud! 70% is enough imo. fixd

I hope my mod helps. This is actually pretty fun to play. And the rhythm is good. But you need to do better in note placement.Many patterns are a bit messy. So good luck on this!!!

-Kamikaze- wrote:

The source should be Gen Sou Musai Shoku, fix it up

No Dap wrote:

Hi mod from modding Q

[Insane]
I would call this extra. stream spacing, jumps..
If you don't want to call this extra and map a new insane, you need to have big big big changes Its too easy for extra, because i can pass it with 96%+ acc, where in most extra ranked difficulties Im getting <93% acc. Its SOLID insane.
00:10:820 (4,5,6) - Im following drums here, your rhythm will break it
00:18:093 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - reduce distance btwn streams cmon, these streams are not that far, im keeping consistent DS
00:33:366 (5) - delete Piano is playing there, listen on 25% or 50% playback rate
01:27:002 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - I really don't think you have to make it this hard Actually its easy part Oo Multiplier there 0,75x so its obvious that DS will be similar to faster parts
01:11:548 (1,2,3,4) - the way you placed them kinda makes it really hard to tell that there is a blue tick In testplays everybody was able to read it
01:19:548 (8,9) - reduce distance plz im accenting piano tone sounds changing, it gives better feel while playing and listen to music, making it easier will only make it worse : P
02:10:638 (8,1) - ^
02:11:730 (6,7,8) - ^

Hope my mod helped, couldn't say much cuz I'm sure you don't want me to say every part that's too hard

No Dap wrote:

-Kamikaze- wrote:

The source should be Gen Sou Musai Shoku, fix it up

you can't give kudosu for that.. or can you?