1. Easy (1,42 stars, 153 notes)
2. Hard (2,81 stars, 381 notes)
3. Normal (1,91 stars, 255 notes)

1. 01:55:345 (3) - NC? I feel the combo went quite long.

1. 00:18:783 (1) - Your combo settings are currently consistently used. Though consider removing this NC to indicate the symmetry pattern better.
2. 01:24:876 (4) - Since there is an interval between (3), consider NC.

1. 00:04:486 - I don't think a drum-finish suits here.
2. 01:44:329 (4,5) - This manual stack can be a normal stack.
3. 01:53:470 (4,5,6,7) - Since (4,5,6) was a symmetry of (1,2,3), the jump of (6,7) felt pretty forced. Just breaking the symmetry and making the distance ordinary will play better.
4. 02:54:173 (1,2) - Start NC from (2) to make the combo setting fit the song better, and for consistency with 02:42:923 (7,1) - 02:50:423 (4,1). Song wasn't 100% same, but were using the same patterns.

Sonnyc wrote:

[Easy]

1. 01:55:345 (3) - NC? I feel the combo went quite long. Hmm.. Makes sense. Added.

[Normal]

1. 00:18:783 (1) - Your combo settings are currently consistently used. Though consider removing this NC to indicate the symmetry pattern better. Hmm.. I prefer to follow the music instead the symetry, at least in this point.
2. 01:24:876 (4) - Since there is an interval between (3), consider NC. Sure.

[Hard]

1. 00:04:486 - I don't think a drum-finish suits here. Well, removed.
2. 01:44:329 (4,5) - This manual stack can be a normal stack. That was not intentional. Fixed.
3. 01:53:470 (4,5,6,7) - Since (4,5,6) was a symmetry of (1,2,3), the jump of (6,7) felt pretty forced. Just breaking the symmetry and making the distance ordinary will play better. Yeah, you're right. I was thinking in this pattern too much, and I knew I were forcing that jump to keep the symetry. I fixed that keeping the constant spacing.
4. 02:54:173 (1,2) - Start NC from (2) to make the combo setting fit the song better, and for consistency with 02:42:923 (7,1) - 02:50:423 (4,1). Song wasn't 100% same, but were using the same patterns. I remade the last combos with your suggestion. I've to agree with you.

CSLM wrote:

nice
i'm glad you're back mancu
probably i'll mod this (if i'm not too lazy xD)

George wrote:

give mapping lessons please

CSLM wrote:

hi o/

Unrankeable
Important
Suggestion

General

1. La dificultad [Hard] no tiene video Por el momento las elimine en todas las dificultades porque he tenido problemas para actualizar. Despues lo voy a agregar xD.
2. soft-sliderside no se esta usando Se supone que lo iba a agregar en la seccion de 00:15:033 - hasta 00:30:033 - hehe. Ya lo arregle, gracias por darte cuenta.
3. mmm... talvez un sb? Naa.. Como dije, va a tener el video en un futuro. Creo que es suficiente.

Easy

1. 00:03:783 (1,2) - ese cambio de polaridad me parece un tanto confuso, ya que en 00:05:658 - hay un beat bastante fuerte y no me parece apropiado en una Easy Creo que tienes razon. Lo cambie todo a 1/1, creo que va a ser mas facil asi.
2. 00:36:595 (2) - mmm... y si cambias la curvatura de este slider? mejoraria el flow imo Me gusta como luce y como fluye actualmente. Prefiero dejarlo asi, es cuestion de gustos creo.
3. 02:34:720 (3,4) - *nazi* mejora el blanket Sabia que alguien lo iba a mencionar xD. Listo.

Normal

1. 00:37:298 - talvez una nota para seguir la voz? Lo prefiero asi porque el siguiente slider enfatiza mucho mejor el comienzo fuerte del instrumental.
2. 01:23:704 (3) - deberias quitar el reverse de aqui y añadir en 01:24:173 - un slider 1/1, de esa manera seguiria mas la vocal y se evitaria ese cambio de polaridad Sinceramente, tenes razon. Remapee un poco esa seccion y lo arregle como vos dijiste.

Hard

1. 00:40:579 (2,3,4,1) - *nazi* y si formas un patron en cuadrado? Naa.. Me gusta como esta jeje.

Short mod because you map it ;w;
I hope it helps :3
GL with rank
choo choo~
Edit: Star (~o.o)~

Kencho wrote:

Hi~

[General]

1. Close WidescreenStoryboard in Easy diff oops.. done

[Easy]

1. Fix the distance snap, there are little bit deviation.
   
   00:02:845 (4) - 1.06x
   00:07:533 (1) - 1.08x Both fixed.

[Normal]

1. Fix the distance snap, there are little bit deviation.
   
   00:03:783 (1) - 00:07:533 (1) -
   00:49:486 (2) - 00:56:751 (2) -
   01:10:111 (2) - 01:24:173 (4) -
   01:26:986 (2) - 1.14x
   01:43:861 (2) - 01:56:283 (3) -
   01:59:564 (3) - 02:01:908 (1) -
   02:25:345 (3,4) - 1.19x
   02:29:798 (4) - 02:35:423 (3) -
   02:46:908 (1) - 02:50:423 (6) - 1.15x
   02:51:126 (1,2) - 1.21x
   02:54:173 (6) - 02:57:923 (4) - In this difficulty I didn't make any changes :/.. The spacing changes that I did here are pretty small and it doesn't have any difficult during the gameplay if you ask me, I did that for aesthetic. I think 0.06 ~ doesn't make any difference, in addition I didn't appreciate any 1.21x or 1.19x as you mentioned in the mod.

[Hard]

1. Just nazi, very good map~ thanks
   
   00:54:408 (1,2) - Fix the stack.
   00:57:220 (3,1) - ^
   02:18:314 (4,5) - ^
   02:48:548 (4,1) - Make a clean blanket. Fixed all these tiny things c:

Cooldue7 wrote:

hello der my friend from my queue

Easy

00:03:783 (1) - what about something like this - http://imgur.com/mWXE854 Hmm.. I think the current rhythm cover better the sound in the music. Anyway, I'll think more about it if anyone mention that again because I'm having some tiny doubts.
00:16:439 (3,1) - fix the blanket like a tiny bit go into 1/16 and scroll till you see it, its like really minor Fixed a bit.

Normal

02:15:736 - you've missed a sound here stack a note on top of 02:15:970 (2) - It was intentional, I didn't want to make it really hard after the break, it could be hard for average players, that's why I prefer to keep that.

Hard

00:03:783 (1,3) - how about like more style points to this and just add a little blanket like this - http://imgur.com/n8uI5sG if you want use that circle to help you but dont actually leave it there since it should be there lel Hmm.. I actually like how this looks and plays, in addition it doesn't make a big difference if you ask me xDD.. I'll leave it as it is for now.
00:46:908 (1) - maybe make this slider as curvy as this one 00:47:845 (3) - since why not I prefer the stright pattern between (4,1), looks nice in my opinion, I don't want a full curvy map hehe.
01:04:251 (2,3,4,1) - what about making a little blanket with those notes since the both of the sliders are slightly curvy Naah.. It wasn't my idea make a "blanket" pattern when I thought that.
01:15:970 (3,4) - fix this blanket a bit the slider end doesnt quite match the circle outside area Yeah.. that's true.
01:42:689 (4,1) - blanket with the slider sort of curve if you wish Hmm.. naah.. it was not my intention
01:51:361 (3,4) - fix this blanket I touched it a bit c:
02:15:033 (1) - i would reccomend making the volume here 60% or a bit lower (55max) since the tune build up to the higher volume at this point 02:16:908 (1) - when you hear that blast thing-ish-whatever I've to agree with you in this point. I used 55% at the beginning in 02:15:033 - and then I added a new green line with 60% in 02:15:970 -, after that everything is the same.
02:25:345 (4,5) - blanket maybe Yeah.. that was my intention in this point. I fixed that.
02:27:689 (3) - x:256 y:328 Fixed this..
02:33:314 (4) - x:340 y:300 Don't a good reason to change that, sincerely.
02:56:986 (4) - x:92 y:96 And.. Moved.

For me it seems fine so far nice song cya

Rawrgasm wrote:

Very, very nice map!

I just have a couple of suggestions.

It's only my opinion of course, completely not compulsary that you change them.

Hard Diff.

- I only suggest not overusing sliders like 01:27:923 (4) - , 01:56:283 (3) - , etc.)
Because I guess it gets a bit repetitive and annoying, But they're so cute :c.. well, talking seriously I'll consider that in my following maps, what's done is done and I think the map is ok at the moment, I really like it. But thanks for your comment, as I said before, I'll keep that in mind for future maps c:


I can't say there's too many, but yeah,

It's just my opinions!

Thanks for reading, love your maps. <3 Thanks a lot

<3

Gordon123 wrote:

take my star o3o

Mao wrote:

mancu is back? c:

mancuso_JM_ wrote:

Mao wrote:

mancu is back? c:

Hmm.. Maybe (?) Who knows xDD