1. Easy (1.57 stars, 98 notes)
2. Hard (3.32 stars, 258 notes)
3. Insane (4.45 stars, 372 notes)
4. Normal (1.98 stars, 153 notes)

Doormat wrote:

mapping machine

-Helium- wrote:

will try my best
maybe i will learn here something ^^

Easy

the only thing that disturb me is 00:21:422 (3) and 01:20:682 (3) ....they feel kinda strange I think it's fine. I can't really think of a better rhythm for this. It's simplified because it's Easy difficulty, so I avoided using 1/2 beat spacing.

Normal

00:07:348 (4,5) - maybe use a reverse slider here I think circles are better for transition to the next part. Repeat slider would just go back to the center, making it difficult to place other objects after without overlap.
01:27:719 (6) - you should do this circle further way because it feels strange to play, the "zhing zhang" (yeah...) comes fast and i expect a circle that is a bit further away I generally avoid jumps in Normal because it's hard for beginner players to predict distance changes.

can't find a thing on hard and insane .-. i stare at this screen for around 45 mins now...nothing

1. 00:21:422 (1,2,3,4) - ok, 3/4 notes and 1/2 notes. this is kinda like a sudden here though. although the pattern seems ok, someone needs to adjust the NC a bit here for more readable enough to react i think idk
2. 00:46:144 (6) - this doesn't emphasize anything, since there's no note here
3. 00:52:533 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - come on. was expecting like a bit intense here, but kinda like a bit easy to hit them all
4. 01:20:682 (1,2,3,4) - saem for the first point

1. nice AR. what about 8 instead lel

1. y no ar5 instead xd

1. oh gr8. AR3 will be more equal enough xd
2. 00:22:903 (1,1) - *imagining sth about these sliders

1. 01:21:792 (x) - I really like the idea of adding a note here

insane

• 00:13:088 (4) - maybe nc this?
  pretty much nothing to point out, maybe keep combos shorter.

hard

• 01:16:237 (1,2,3) - these sliders could be placed in better ways or have more interesting shapes imo
  pretty much same as above, nothing to point out, map is good

Seni wrote:

hey nm from q

Insane

00:07:348 (3) - honestly I'd love to see a NC here because it would make it so much easier to read a_a Added.

00:48:366 (2,3,4) - maybe space this out a bit more since 3 and 4 are snares? I definitely think it could use more emphasis. I think the spacing is big enough.

00:52:533 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Add claps on the white ticks since there are snares. imo it could also use a bit larger spacing. I feel it's a bit underwhelming while playing. It's even smaller than 00:19:940 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) which is only kicks on every second 1/2. If not that maybe make 00:19:940 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) smaller. I don't think there is any reason it should have more emphasis than 00:52:533 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) Added claps. I think the placement is fine. It has emphasis from tighter angle, and the small polygons fit the feeling of the music imo.

00:54:755 (2) - Maybe a 1/2 slider that leads into the stream would be nice to emphasize the vocals? there isn't any particularly strong sound on 00:54:940 (1) and you seem to focus a lot on the vocals in this map. Realized this is 1/6, so I changed it accordingly, but I prefer the circle there.

01:00:681 (4,5) - add claps Added a clap.

01:06:607 (6) - clap Added.

some of the hitsounds don't follow the song but I'll just take that as artistic freedom and mention only the ones you missed I think really need the emphasis.

I hope you find some of my suggestions useful a_a

• 
  Easy

1. 00:21:422 (3) - on this moment you ignore many beats. Maybe to increase him
2. 00:49:570 (4) - NC?
3. 00:54:015 (4) - in this moment player want to rest, you can use 1 note
4. 01:20:682 (3) - ^
5. 00:56:977 (3,1) - these moments identical.

• 
  Normal

1. 00:43:088 - you ignore beat, Make as here 00:45:866 (4) -
2. 00:47:903 - place a note?
3. lot of notes end on strong beat, it's a bad :с 00:56:977 (3,4,1,2,1,2,1,4,1,2,1,2) - and so on.

• 
  Hard

1. 00:59:940 (1) - you never used on this diff such sliders except 01:08:088 (3,1) -
2. 00:26:977 (5,6) - hy you stak them? p
3. 01:22:904 (3,4,5,6) - ^ you can stack but not always.

1. 00:33:551 - Mapping this beat takes away emphasis from the rhythm at 00:34:292 (5,6,7) . There is also no drum beat here either so so did you do this for the string instrument or something? Anyways I think this would be more suitable if you turned 00:33:274 (1) into a 1/1 slider or deleted 00:33:551 (2)
2. 00:51:792 (4) - This slider just looks out of place looking at the rest of your map
3. 00:48:088 (1,2,3) - The only double in the map is 00:48:366 (2,3) which can prove to be a bit tricky/frustrating from a player's perspective, would you consider simplifying the rhythm with an addition of a slider?

1. 01:09:570 (6) - Move to 01:09:755 , stack on 01:09:940 (7) and add whistle? Same for 01:12:533 (5) if you choose to do so

Rizen wrote:

Easy

1. 00:06:977 (2,3) - perhaps try circle then slider so the slider covers those plucking noises I think slider end and circle work better for that, since it feels more detached that way.
2. 00:21:422 (3) - and 00:54:015 (3) - perhaps you can try further simplifying the sliders to 2/1 sliders as there kinda isn't anything on the slider repeat end ticks Repeat slider fits the feel of the song better imo.

Normal

1. 00:36:792 (4) - maybe try moving this to 00:36:051 - for consistency with 00:30:125 (3) - ? ok
2. 00:36:977 (1,2) - swap NCs around? if so, remove NC at 00:39:200 (1) - fixed combos.
3. 00:49:200 - perhaps add a circle here for the snare drums I think it's fine without that.

Hard

1. 01:24:015 (3) - this circle is kinda hidden by the slider tail so perhaps you could try custom stacking this for readability It's not really hidden.

Insane

1. 01:00:866 (6,7) - I feel as though this needs a tad more spacing emphasis, similar to 01:00:218 (2,3) - . Fixed.

sorry in advance if this mod is useless ;;

good luck!!

iYiyo wrote:

Hi! From my queue, sorry for late, wasn't in the mood to mod xd

• 
  [general]

1. disable widescreen on normal sure
2. compress the BG? Right know its file size is bigger than the actual mp3 lol I don't think it matters.
   
   [Insane]
3. 00:07:348 (1,2) - since both have same sound in the music, maybe you'd want to add a whistle for 00:07:533 (2) - aswell? ok
4. 00:08:088 (1,2) - 00:11:051 (1,2) - 00:14:014 (1,2) - 00:16:977 (1,2) - Kinda pointed some but I guess you get the idea. I recommend you to keep these distance a bit more consistent since it's very noticeable when playing. It doesn't matter.
5. 00:21:700 (1) - I don't think this should have nc, it feels a bit of a spam. with 00:21:422 (1) - is enough to recognize the DS change. fixed.
6. 00:23:181 - 00:25:403 - 00:26:144 - All these have same sound. recommend you to set 00:25:403 - a clap instead of whistle. The sound is different.
7. 00:27:162 (8,9,1) - 00:27:162 (8,9,1) - 00:27:903 (5,6,7) - Don't know why they have different hitsounds D: For me they have same sounds, maybe you wanted variation? however I think you should keep consistent. They have different sounds.
8. 00:35:774 - Here there is the same emptyness as 00:36:144 - but 00:36:144 (8) - here you don't add whistles? Feels very empty in terms of hitsounds, recommend you to add it so you also keep consistency with other notes before. (7) has whistle because that's where that sound is.
9. 00:48:366 (2,3) - I'd move this a bit upwards since distance is 00:48:088 (1,2,4) - similar for these but you have to take note the slider leniency of 00:48:088 (1,2) - . It's not a 1/2 gap but a 3/4 one... so yeah adding a bit more space to represent better the timegap would be great. Moved.
10. 00:58:737 - and 00:59:477 - you're not following vocals but suddenly you do it 01:00:218 - here D: It also feels inconsistent in terms of hitsounds as well so yeah, I really expected claps here 01:00:311 - Instrument also shifts there as part of the transition to the next half of the chorus.
11. 01:09:385 (3) - make it claps? similar as 01:07:903 - here i guess No.
12. 01:09:107 (2) - same as before.
13. 01:20:960 (1) - same nc thing as before.
    
    [Hard]
14. 00:35:311 (2,3,4) - This is the only non-stack triplet you use here and it feels like it's a bit alone xd consider stacking it for better playabilty maybe? I think it flows better this way.
15. 00:45:866 (3,4) - shouldn't this have a bit more space compared to 00:45:496 (2,3) - ? It has same emphasize as 00:43:088 (4,5) - in music Made a jump.
16. 00:53:829 (1) - move it to 388|312 for better triangle? No.
17. maybe you want to apply similar hitsounds stuff I mentioned in Insane

Okay that's all from me. Hope it helps! GL