1. Hard (4.74 stars, 179 notes)
2. Insane (4.99 stars, 236 notes)
3. Normal (3.19 stars, 81 notes)

KoiSuru_ wrote:

[Normal]
00:03:190 (2) - 슬라이더를 조금 더 펴보세요~? 펴봤어요
00:14:710 (2) - S자형 슬라이더라면 확실하게 더 굽혀주는게 보기 좋을 것 같아요.. 그럴까요? 약간 수정
00:21:670 (3) - 여기에 뉴 콤보 추가하시고서 00:23:110 여기에 노트 하나 추가하시는건 어떤가요? 매핑 패턴상 뉴콤보 안한 겁니다 ㅎ
00:25:510 (1) - 이 슬라이더를 00:25:990 (2) - 이 노트 삭제한 뒤에 00:26:230 (3) - 이 슬라이더에서 떼보는건 어떤가요? 수정
01:01:990 이 구간부터 01:17:110 이 구간까지는 드럼 노멀 사운드 대신에 노멀 클랩 사운드를 사용해보시는건 어떤가요? 유지할래요

[Hard]
00:37:030 (5) - 뉴콤보! 헉! 수정
01:06:790 (3) - 그냥 이 부분도 01:05:830 (1,2) - 이 패턴대로 해서 계속 가보시는게 더 나아보여요..! http://puu.sh/1oWgA 위로 올라가기 위한 선택이었습니다 ㅋ
01:01:990 ~ 01:17:110 노멀 모딩과 같이 노멀 클랩 사운드는 어떤가요? *~*

[Insane]
00:03:200 (3,1) - 이 부분 디스턴스를 조금만 줄이는게 좋을 것 같아요~ 일단 둘게요
00:20:710 (5,6,7,8) - 가독성엔 딱히 문제 없어보이지만.. 그래도 순서대로 가는게 좋을 것 같아요 지그재그(?) 맘에 안드셨나요 ㅎ 지적 또 오면 수정할래요
00:25:510 (1) - 이 부분도 가독성엔 문제 없어보이지만 디스턴스를 조금 벌리는게 좋을 것 같아요 역시 수정이 낫겠죠..?
00:35:110 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 서클 기준으로 네개까지는 괜찮아보이는데.. 조금 다른 패턴으로 가는게 좋을 것 같아요.. 아니면 서클을 재배치 하신다던가.. 귀찮긔 ㅠㅠ 일단 간격을 좁혀봤어요
00:40:390 (6) - , 00:42:310 (3) - 앞에 나온 노트들 때문에 혹 헷갈릴 가능성이 염려되는 부분이에요.. ?? 딱히 헷갈릴거 같지는 않습니다만,,
00:42:790 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 이 부분도.. 이런 비슷한 패턴의 비트맵이 종종 있긴 있지만 그래도 서클을 재배치 하신다던가 하는게 좋을 것 같아요.. 하하.. 드럽죠.. 리매핑하는 방향으로..


이상 허접한 모딩이었습니다 헤헤

JSsky wrote:

[노멀]

00:21:670 (3) - 전체힛사보단 처음과 끝에 whistle 넣는건 어떨까요? ㅋ 다 이렇게 하려 했는데 급 매핑 하다보니 신경 안쓴듯.. 그냥 전부 삭제

00:29:350 (3) - ^

01:16:870 (1,2) - 슬라로 만드는것입니다! 개별 음이니까 그냥 둘래요 ㅎ

[하드]
　
00:10:630 (2) - 대칭이긴 하지만 1번 슬라이더를 x:88 y:120 으로 바꾸신 후에 대칭으로 하는게 좋을듯합니다. ? 안하는 걸로..
　
[인샌]

00:19:990 (2) - 00:19:270 (4)의 꼬리부분에다 배치하는것이 어떨까요. 하하 네


..죄송합니다. 제 실력으론 이정도 밖에 못 잡아내겠네요.
　
너무나도 짧은모딩 죄송합니다.

[Draka] wrote:

>w<

[Normal]

00:29:350 (3) - 방향을 뒤집는건? (2) 뒤에 오는 위치는 저곳이 적절할거 같습니다~

00:59:590 (3) - 키아이 들어갈때까지 간격이 좀 있으니까 뒤집어도 무리는 없을 것 같습니다. 여기부터 끝까지 ctrl+H 결정

[Insane]

00:11:120 (1,2) - 박자에 맞게 서클 처리로 하는게 어떨까요 빙글빙글 매핑입니다 ㅋㅅㅋ

00:14:950 (1,2,3) - 5타는 어떨까요? 수정

00:41:590 (2) - 바로 뒤에 서클 하나 넣으면 허전한게 좀 사라질 것 같네요 일단 그대로 둘래요

00:43:750 (5,6,7,8) - 6, 8의 위치를 서로 바꾸면 좋을 것 같아요 나름 변형시킨 ㅋ 이부분은 리맵될듯


하드는 제가 마땅히 짚을 게 없네요... 뭐랄까 모딩하기 어려운 ㅜㅜ

Sorry my bad mod xd

Dark Fang wrote:

모딩 받나 마나

[General]

CountDown 꺼주세요 비활성화 되있습니다. // 네

[Hard]

00:07:990 (2) - 이 노트를 지우시고 다음 슬라이더와 겹쳐보시는건 어떤가요? // 디스크 소리(?)를 위한 노트들입니다
00:35:830 (2) - 왼쪽으로 1칸 ? 그저 밸런스있게 맞추려고.. // 미세하지만 (1,2,3)의 둥근 정도가 줄어들고 디스탄스 문제는 크게 없는 걸로 판단하고 있습니다..
01:00:550 (2) - 1칸 위로 // 네

[Insane]

00:33:430 (2,3) - Ctrl + G ? 만약 바꾸신다면 힛사조정도.. // 네, 이게 더 좋겠네요


잘 만드셧네요 괜히 뻘쭘해지는...

Star~

gdeath wrote:

Hello! // Hi

[Normal]
00:52:390 (1) - remove new combo. // Uhh,, This is for the NC patterns, as followed before
As you see, nearly new combo per 2 notes.
imo, I dont think it's a good choice to switch combo frequently.

[Hard]
no problem.

[Insane]
00:29:350 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - It would be better, if you could make spacing bigger since it's an insane diff, I feel the current pattern is a bit easy. // 1.50x is large enough, imo
01:17:110 (9) - I know you wanna stack the note in the the centre of circle. // Since the distance of the notes were far, I think this pattern is good enough to place,, Even you consider this is overused
but considering you used this pattern before, I would suggest to put it on top centre in order to avoid overusing.

the bg is interesting. I felt the local atmosphere.

1. 00:01:750 (4)
   00:05:590 (4)
   00:09:430 (4)
   00:10:630 (4)
   00:24:790 (7)
   00:26:710 (4)
   00:55:510 (6)
   00:57:430 (5)
   01:03:190 (5)
   01:05:110 (5)
   01:10:870 (5)
   01:12:790 (3) - I'd say those 1/4 note(slider) are hard to hit, since you used almost the same spacing to those notes(sliders) to 1/2 ones, reduce the spacing would help, just like 1/4 spacing you used to 00:01:030 (2). Or maybe you can increase the spacing of whole diff so that the spacing looked more consistent
2. 00:55:030 (5) - This jump seems come too sudden, why stack 00:54:790 (4) under 3 but not put it in usual spacing?
3. 01:17:110 (9) - NC maybe, it's the end note and spacing is different

Breeze wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:01:750 (4)
   00:05:590 (4)
   00:09:430 (4)
   00:10:630 (4)
   00:24:790 (7)
   00:26:710 (4)
   00:55:510 (6)
   00:57:430 (5)
   01:03:190 (5)
   01:05:110 (5)
   01:10:870 (5)
   01:12:790 (3) - I'd say those 1/4 note(slider) are hard to hit, since you used almost the same spacing to those notes(sliders) to 1/2 ones, reduce the spacing would help, just like 1/4 spacing you used to 00:01:030 (2). Or maybe you can increase the spacing of whole diff so that the spacing looked more consistent // I'll fix ones with the 1/2
2. 00:55:030 (5) - This jump seems come too sudden, why stack 00:54:790 (4) under 3 but not put it in usual spacing? // Fix
3. 01:17:110 (9) - NC maybe, it's the end note and spacing is different // Fix

Others looked fine

Wolf wrote:

Woof~
From my Modding Queue

General
I quite don't like the drums hitsounds in some sliders. It doesn't match with the song in my opinion. I would keep adding the normal claps. // Just putted in for consistency, and some fun
You have chosen 0.8x and 1.0x of spacing in Normal, is this alright? // As long it is fine to hit..
Everything else looks fine to me.

Normal
00:12:790 (2,1) - Even though this is symmetric, it doesn't match with your 0.8x spacing. You should take a look at this. // I think this is ok.. New players can hit that imo
00:17:830 (3) -I really wished this slider could be faced to 00:18:550 (2) -, but it isn't, so how about a different pattern here? A simple stack could be nice here: http://puu.sh/1Hgnc - http://puu.sh/1HgmD // Something like a copy with 00:15:910 (1,2).. I also dont think this is a bad shape
or you could just make something like 00:13:990 (1) -
01:11:110 (4,1) - Overlap doesn't look good imo. // Made some space
00:29:350 (1) - Fix spacing. // No, this is an intention to start at the head of 00:27:430 (1)
01:15:430 (1) - Would replace it for a spin, so the last two notes 01:16:870 (2,3) - can be moved to the center of the grid. // Fix

Hard
00:03:910 (2) - Fix spacing. // Wanted something like 1.00 and 1.00?? Fixed lol
00:33:190 (1,2,3) - Move them to x:184 y:80? http://puu.sh/1HgRw Look better for me. // Intention to put (1) up at the slider..
00:45:670 (3) - Move to x:432 y: 216, because you'll be able to make 00:46:390 (1,2,3) - symmetric. http://puu.sh/1HgVT // Well, just moved the slider and changed some
01:11:110 (6) - Aligned with 01:10:390 (5) - looks better imo: http://puu.sh/1HgYT // I dont like aligns that much..

Insane
Couldn't find considerable amount of problems here, but:
00:32:710 (6) - Shouldn't this be aligned with 00:31:990 (5) - curvature? // ? Fix
00:36:070 (5,6,7,8) - Make it like 00:35:110 (1,2,3,4) - ? Copy/paste should work fine here for the symmetry. // Hard to do that, due to the pattern afterwards
01:15:430 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Nice jumps. // :p

This is all I could find.
Good luck~