Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)

The Offspring - You're Gonna Go Far Kid

posted
Total Posts
61
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 4:36:30 PM

Artist: The Offspring
Title: You're Gonna Go Far Kid
Tags: MarioBros777 MB777 rock guitar gens
BPM: 126
Filesize: 6983kb
Play Time: 02:54
Difficulties Available:
  1. Gens (4.76 stars, 314 notes)
  2. Hard (4.47 stars, 324 notes)
  3. Normal (3.02 stars, 156 notes)
  4. Not That Far (1 stars, 87 notes)
Download: The Offspring - You're Gonna Go Far Kid
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Warning: Contains offensive language, please download with caution around mother.

The maps are complete, sure it's only a normal and a hard but I think this will work quite nicely. Thanks a ton of kudos to awp for taking the time to time the map. It really helped out.

Thanks to MB777 for providing an easy diff and for suggesting a small SB that makes it look at tad nicer.
Another thanks to Gens for making an insane diff. (which I thought I wouldn't be able to pull off)

Recent Changes:
Minor Suggestion from Xgor.
Suggestions from blissfulyoshi.
Suggestions from YGOkid8 and Dusty, sorry for such a long wait!
Suggestions from Starrodkirby. Please re download for an improved BG.
Gens' awesome diff is in here now.
More suggestions from Starrod.
Lardo <3
Last edited by rust45 , edited 31 times in total.
cyanberryio
424 posts
Joined August 2008
cyanberryio
Offset: 1,480

I said this in IRC, but just posting it.

No star yet~ But if I like the outcome, it'll come! :)
Torran
724 posts
Joined November 2008
Torran
Definitely multiple timing sections so I can't help :|
But here's the BPM for the first part:
BPM 126.25
Offset 1,490
eee
692 posts
Joined January 2008
eee
Oh, man, I like this song, tried mapping it when I was n00b, then never went back :/
I can kinda tell the timing was gonna just be the ordinary timing just on red ticks at different offsets, this is kinda like that.
Here's What I Got

[TimingPoints]
1495.86188616071,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
16470,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
24311,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
38821,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
56662,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
71675,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
79522,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
94032,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
112083,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
126587,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
141540,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
157229,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0
172690,476.190476190476,4,1,0,100,1,0

Overwrite the [Timing Points] Section in the .osu in Notepad, Then save using notepad and you should be clear.
I'm am definitely not perfect with timing, BUT this'll makes the mapping much easier, and is pretty close :)
*Ahem*
SPOILER


Last edited by eee , edited 1 time in total.
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45
Thanks for the timing help, the some places still seem iffy, but I can properly map now knowing it won't be incredibly off.
cyanberryio
424 posts
Joined August 2008
cyanberryio
The following are suggestions/opinions. But you should already know that.

[Normal]
Why doesn't this have the volume sections as in [Hard]?
00:21:94 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This pattern may confuz the newbites.
00:34:31 (1) - Make this start a 1/2 tick later like in [Hard]. (Maybe even extend a bit like in [Hard]?
01:17:15 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Newbites might be confuzed.
01:45:69 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^

[Hard]
Nothing bugged me cause I'm not picky. ;)

Hard is a little slow, maybe Whisper's solo got to me. :P But I like it, could be a little more challenging. :P
But deserving of a star!
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45

Alex0686 wrote:

The following are suggestions/opinions. But you should already know that.

[Normal]
Why doesn't this have the volume sections as in [Hard]? What? It's all max the whole way through on both diffs.
00:21:94 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This pattern may confuz the newbites.
00:34:31 (1) - Make this start a 1/2 tick later like in [Hard]. (Maybe even extend a bit like in [Hard]? Don't want the end too close to the next note, but starting later yes.
01:17:15 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Newbites might be confuzed.
01:45:69 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^

[Hard]
Nothing bugged me cause I'm not picky. ;)

Hard is a little slow, maybe Whisper's solo got to me. :P But I like it, could be a little more challenging. :P I think it may be because I mapped this as a hard instead of insane which only insane has the solo on whispers. But if anyone wants to make an Insane go right ahead(I just don't really feel like I need it though, but if you map one well, then I'll add it.)
But deserving of a star!
Thanks, you get kudos.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
Awesome.

Normal
Significant overuse of whistles here. Please remove some of them. >_<

Hard
Also too many whistles. Sort it out!
00:03:87 (7,8,9) - The are a bunch of notes like this, but to get them on time you'll need to use 1/3
01:19:29 (3,4) - Seriously looks like 1/4. Put a new combo on 01:19:29 (3,4) and space it to the same spacing as 01:18:81 (1,2,3)
02:46:59 (5,6,7,8) - Back 1/6
Generally, this whole song is 1/6. It's probably that lots more notes need to be moved around like that but I'll leave it to you.
Mismagius
9,239 posts
Joined July 2008
Mismagius
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Gens
osu! Alumni
3,485 posts
Joined August 2008
Gens
The timing is good~ You may still want to get awp for fine tuning though, there are 2 or 3 sections that still sound iffy... It's still good though.

[Hard]

- 2x sliders without warning? :(

01:04:28 (2,3,4) - This is rather confusing.

- And maybe set the preview point to 00:38:82?

I actually kind of like the song. The map too~
But yeah, you need to get awp for this. Or someone else good at timing. I'm going to star this for now~

2011 edit: mirrors everywhere
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45

Gens wrote:

[Hard]

- 2x sliders without warning? :( I think it works for now, the ticks give hint of a 2x and it pretty easy to follow

01:04:28 (2,3,4) - This is rather confusing. fixed

- And maybe set the preview point to 00:38:82? I prefer where it is.
I posted in the timing topic and I know awp looks there, so I'll just wait, but if I get up 8 priority then I'll see about talking to him directly.
0_o
2,155 posts
Joined December 2008
0_o
Normal
01:42:36 (3) - It was a little hard to tell this was a slider, it almost tripped me up

Hard
Some of the timing/snapping is kinda sketchy but I don't really know what to do about it so I'll ignore it
00:39:53 (2) - I normally don't point out hitsound stuff but this is BEGGING for a finish (maybe a new combo if you want too)
00:42:86 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - It'd be nice if this was symettrical on the y-axis (symettrical patterns that aren't symettrical across the grid is a pet peeve of mine :P)
02:21:77 (1) - Finish on the end?

horrible band starred
Kytoxid
osu! Alumni
1,369 posts
Joined April 2009
Kytoxid
Sounds very cool overall, starred.

Suggestions: (mostly strict things to make notes line up a bit better with the beat)

[Normal]

00:21:94 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Follows the lyrics a bit better if taken 1/8 early.
00:41:67 (6) - Down to align with 3,4,5?

[Hard]

00:02:36 (4) - Make it 1/12th earlier. (move it onto the 1/4 beat before it)
00:03:99 (8) - Move it 1/12th later. (onto the 1/3)
00:37:64 (1) - Very unexpected 2x slider.
00:53:82 (1) - Shorten by 1/1?
02:45:48 (3,4) - 1/6th earlier? (sounds a bit weird either way, might just be me though)
02:48:41 (1) - End it 1/6th sooner?
02:50:24 (1,2,3,4) - 1/6th earlier?
rust45
1,088 posts
Joined May 2009
Topic Starter
rust45

Kytoxid wrote:

00:41:67 (6) - Down to align with 3,4,5?
I don't think so...
The snapping I won't mess with until I get the correct timing.
And I'll see about getting an SB warning for the slider.
Mismagius
9,239 posts
Joined July 2008
Mismagius
1st section: Offset 1.499 i think
2nd: good
3rd: ^
4th: ^
5th: 56.675
6th to end: good for me
anonymous_old
0 posts
Here since the beginning
anonymous_old
Good enough.
awp
osu! Alumni
11,869 posts
Here since the beginning
awp
Timing
1. Offset: 1,494ms BPM: 126.00
2. Offset: 16,710ms BPM: 126.25
3. Offset: 24,285ms BPM: 126.00
4. Offset: 39,537ms BPM: 126.00
5. Offset: 56,673ms BPM: 126.00
6. Offset: 71,910ms BPM: 126.25
7. Offset: 79,518ms BPM: 126.00
8. Offset: 94,750ms BPM: 126.00
9. Offset: 111,852ms BPM: 126.50
10. Offset: 127,065ms BPM: 126.00
11. Offset: 142,265ms BPM: 126.30
12. Offset: 172,684ms BPM: 126.00

Well something like that
Matma Rex
586 posts
Joined March 2009
Matma Rex
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
KatanAnime
58 posts
Joined November 2008
KatanAnime
Overall Map is good but there are some spacing issues in both normal and hard imo...
But i Really liked the map so star! :D
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 61