1. eLtXXx's Normal (1.77 stars, 257 notes)
2. Hard (2.74 stars, 389 notes)
3. Normal (1.65 stars, 268 notes)
4. Xinely's Easy (1.55 stars, 218 notes)

scanter wrote:

랭크점..

Minao wrote:

Hi!
Good job here! But I have some suggestions:
00:59:529 (1) - I think this circle is too far from the previous circle and/or the next circle. Let me explain: at the end of the previous slider n°3, there is half a time until circle n°4. There is the same time between n°4 blue and n°1 white, but n°1 white is far from n°4 blue compared to how the end of the slider n°3 and circle n°4 are far from. And it's the same from n°1 to n°2 white compared to the rest of the music.. I hope it's clear XD I think you have 2 solutions: 1) You remove circle n°1 blue because it is not something you can hear from the music (this rhythm isn't sang) --- 2) You put n°1 blue near to n°2 blue so it shows clearly that it's a new "sentence" and you delete the space problem between n°1 and n°2. i agree about it, moved some notes
Or you do nothing if you desagree :3
There is the same kind of problem here:
01:46:742 (1) ^
01:50:676 (1) ^
01:54:611 (1) ^
02:02:480 (1) but i didn't fix since this current pattern plays good enough imo
You can keep it like it is if you want to make it a part of your map difficulty for the player. Again, it's only my opinion, but like this I think it's not "natural" for the player.
03:21:291 (1) -1) I honestly don't see the point of adding a spinner here; if a music ends without a spinner it's not a problem so I think here it is useless because the music is already over (there is a sound but I don't think it's audible enought to put a spinner here). because i want to give some chances to have variable scores with that spinner
2) I don't understand why you put some inherited points at the end, I think you can do without it i added it to give 5% volume sound on the end of spinner

That's all Good luck!

• 
  Feel free to reject suggestions that would increase the star rating of this difficulty.

1. 00:22:146 (1,2) - Personally speaking, it doesn't make sense to me that you would use an "easier" pattern when the music is starting to pick up with additional instruments coming in. Besides, you missed some mapped vocal rhythm at the white ticks within this 3/2 reverse slider. SO I SUGGEST
   
   SPOILER

   
   Having too many circles in a row would increase star rating, so instead of having two circles, i would suggest using a simple 1/1 slider, and then 1/2 reverse slider to capture the vocal and strong piano at the red tick, with a finish touch of the pattern with the circle :3 (longest single pattern mod i ever wrote on easy ftw)
2. 00:26:572 (3) - ^^^^
3. 01:50:670 (1,2) - I think it would be cool to make them symmetric to a diagonal line..
4. One thing that bothers me is how from 02:02:474 - to 02:18:211 - , you suddenly stopped using 1/2 rhythms (you used 1/2 rhythm once in that whole time period contrary to other kiai times so far), maybe you want to rethink about the rhythm density of the kiai time? I know continuing the same 1/2 rhythm would be a disaster for star rating (but you already exceeded 1.5 :S), but I don't think it makes good sense to reduce the note density back to a verse level on a kiai >w<
   
   Welp, well executed diff, can't really improve more at aesthetics/flow level :<
   
   Oh yeah, you might wanna make this easy EASIER OR make normal harder, since the total difference in object count between easy and normal is only 40ish :S

1. 00:05:425 (3,4) - I would just make this into a 1/1 slider because of vocal still ringing through 00:05:425 - to 00:05:916 -
2. 00:06:408 (5) - and make THIS two circles instead
3. 00:08:375 - hmm..easy mapped this beat out, how about you do the same?
4. 00:12:310 - ^^
5. 00:20:179 (4) - make it a S shape slider for the feels? :S
6. 00:33:949 (3) - this is not exactly on the same y level as 00:33:457 (2) - , is it intentional?
7. 00:36:900 (1) - I think you missed a clap here
8. 00:40:834 (1) - yo this snare is VERY LOUD
   Can you consider using consistent clap hitsound for the part 00:36:900 - to 00:51:654 - ? Or at least fix the custom 1 hitsound volumes, or raise custom 3 histound volumes.
9. 01:04:687 (2) - x:288 y:264 for better feels flow you shouldn't need to adjust 01:04:933 (3) - that much
10. 01:24:113 (2) - did you forget a clap at slider head?
11. 01:26:080 (5) - ^^
12. 01:42:802 (1) - i think you forgot a clap at slider tail :<
13. 02:03:949 (4,5) - recheck blankets
14. 02:04:933 (5,6) - and I don't think these are exactly the same shape either
15. 02:33:949 (1,2,3) - personally I would have made 3 and 1 symmetric but its your choice
16. 02:39:359 (2) - is there any reason why this is not directly above 1's slider head?
    
    that's all she said
    interesting hitsounding (maybe cus im2lazy to do hitsounds like this lel)

1. 00:24:360 (2) - 흠, 이 노트를 제거해서 조그마한 휴식 시간을 주는 것도 괜찮을 것 같은데여 //I think it would be neat to remove this note for a small break
2. 00:45:507 (1,2,3,4) - 이거 잘하시면 3 끝을 1로 담요로 덮으실 수 있을 듯. 어차피 4에서 00:47:721 (1) - 는 점프니 DS에 구애받지도 않은텐데여 //you can blanket 3's end to slider 1, you don't have to worry about rearranging other patterns since its a jump from 4 to 00:47:721 (1) - anyways
3. 00:55:589 (1,3) - ㄷ-담요 //b-blanket
4. 00:57:557 (1,2) - 솔직히 2를 1로 하고 1을 2로 하는게 더 나을 듯 한데...이러면 00:57:065 (4) - 에서 1까지 흐름이 망하지만 어차피 1/1 박자의 시간이 있으니 문제없을 듯 // Personally I would swap position of these two. It does screw up the flow from the note before it but come on you have 122bpm 1/1 worth of time to react to it
5. 02:16:245 (1,2,3) - 이거 3의 각도가 1,2와 매우 쬐에에에에끔 다른듯 // The angle of slope of 3 is SLIIIIGHTLY different from 1,2
6. 02:33:950 (1,2) - 일부러 담요안한걸로 치겠음...//I'll take it as you didn't want to blanket here;;;
7. 02:57:803 (2) - DS가 살짝 더 커서 조금 어긋나 보이네요, 최소 1.1x로 줄이는게 더 깔끔해 보일듯 // The DS is slight inconsistent (the difference is about 0.07x WHICH IS NOTICEABLE.), better fix it to 1.1x :3
   
   아흐흐흐흐흑 이 아름다운 담요들 보쇼 //Look at dem blankets everywhere
   패턴하나 바꾸면 맵 전체 흐름이 망한다 //Change one pattern and map ded

guineaQ wrote:

[Hardu]

1. 00:24:360 (2) - 흠, 이 노트를 제거해서 조그마한 휴식 시간을 주는 것도 괜찮을 것 같은데여 //I think it would be neat to remove this note for a small break 피아노 음도 있고하고 이전 파트에 비해 음도 더 다양해서 일부러 넣은거에요
2. 00:45:507 (1,2,3,4) - 이거 잘하시면 3 끝을 1로 담요로 덮으실 수 있을 듯. 어차피 4에서 00:47:721 (1) - 는 점프니 DS에 구애받지도 않은텐데여 //you can blanket 3's end to slider 1, you don't have to worry about rearranging other patterns since its a jump from 4 to 00:47:721 (1) - anyways ㅇㅋ
3. 00:55:589 (1,3) - ㄷ-담요 //b-blanket 글쎄요 굳이 안고쳐도 될듯해요
4. 00:57:557 (1,2) - 솔직히 2를 1로 하고 1을 2로 하는게 더 나을 듯 한데...이러면 00:57:065 (4) - 에서 1까지 흐름이 망하지만 어차피 1/1 박자의 시간이 있으니 문제없을 듯 // Personally I would swap position of these two. It does screw up the flow from the note before it but come on you have 122bpm 1/1 worth of time to react to it 오 개굿
5. 02:16:245 (1,2,3) - 이거 3의 각도가 1,2와 매우 쬐에에에에끔 다른듯 // The angle of slope of 3 is SLIIIIGHTLY different from 1,2 제가 저 패턴 만들때 2번 슬라이더 길이를 2배로 늘리고 배치한거라서 같을꺼라고 생각해요 그리고 맞춰봤는데 각도는 같아 보여요. 나만 그런가...
6. 02:33:950 (1,2) - 일부러 담요안한걸로 치겠음...//I'll take it as you didn't want to blanket here;;; 나름대로 하긴 한건데 ㅠㅠ
7. 02:57:803 (2) - DS가 살짝 더 커서 조금 어긋나 보이네요, 최소 1.1x로 줄이는게 더 깔끔해 보일듯 // The DS is slight inconsistent (the difference is about 0.07x WHICH IS NOTICEABLE.), better fix it to 1.1x :3 핵굿

Tarrasky wrote:

Hard

00:48:704 (3,4,5) - maybe you can change to this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2336645 eh.. sorry but i prefer current pattern