1. cool

1. 00:15:700 (4) - maybe make this a 1/4 slider to also map the kick at 00:15:852 - (you can also just add a circle) There's also a kick at 00:15:245 - that you can map, if you want
   
2. 00:23:124 (4,1) - this jump is a little big imo, you can save all the big jumps for kiai time
   
3. 00:23:276 (1,2) - just a suggestion, see if this improves the flow into 00:23:882 (3) - :
   
   
4. 01:20:700 (2,3) - , 01:33:730 (2,3) - not perfectly stacked, but not like anyone is going to notice when they're playing

• 
  Diff looks good, so I'm not sure how else you could improve it. I'll just toss in some suggestions

1. 01:30:094 (2) - see if it flows better if you stack this under the tail of 01:29:639 (9) - , although I think the current placement is fine as it is
   
2. 00:22:215 (2,3,4) - just a suggestion, maybe you will like this arrangement better:
   
   

• 
  I agree that cs4.5 is a lot better than cs5. Anyways small circle size often leaves too much empty space on the playing field, which may make the map structure look unappealing i have no idea what i just said

1. 00:28:730 (1) - 00:28:730 (1) - consider ending this on 00:29:185 - then adding a circle with finish hitsound at 00:29:336 - . I think this creates more emphasis than having it on the slider tail.
   
2. 00:45:700 (3,4) - maybe this will look better (or something like this):
   
   ::::

   
3. 01:03:882 (3) - perhaps you can add a point after the red point to make a smoother curve upwards, and also move the last point up a bit so the curve is sharper to match the vocal increasing in pitch:
   
   ::::

   
4. 01:08:124 (1) - I think a simple curve here looks better than a linear curve, matches vocal nicely as the vocal increases in pitch sort of like a curve. idk
   
5. 01:09:791 (4,1,2,3,4) - do you even jump m8
   
6. 01:10:549 (1) - imo this slider is too long, a 1/2 slider would be fine since you can add notes at 01:11:003 - and 01:11:155 - . This slider drags on for pretty long and might make this part seem excessively slow. Anyways, shorten the slider so you can keep the rhythm going.
   
7. 01:36:912 (6,7) - how about arranging it like this:
   
   ::::

   
   Currently you have a bigger jump between 01:36:761 (5,6) - than 01:36:912 (6,7) - . I feel that the bigger jump should be between the last two objects, which is why I suggest you arrange the objects like I mentioned above in the picture.
   
   Looks neat since in the picture 01:36:609 (4,5,6) - and 01:36:155 (2,5,7) - forms a triangle.

Easy

• nothing much to say about the diff, just some personal ideas ~

1. 00:47:215 (2,3,4,1,2) - Although it is a low-BPM song, I still think that too much single taps in few seconds is quite challenging for Newbies. I'd try to reduce some of them or combine into sliders instead. I'd suggest you convert 00:47:518 (3,4) - into a 1/1 slider, also emphasize the vocal behind.
2. 00:51:458 - I am not sure but I would put something here since the vocal is quite obvious for me Try something like this? :
   
3. 01:03:276 (1) - I would put it some grids down to avoid touching the life bar here. Also, if you want a cleaner pattern, try to rotate it a bit and make a symmetric with 01:03:882 (2)
4. 01:15:397 (1,2,3,4) - same as the 1st suggestion, you may reduce some circles here. But its okay if you want to keep this since I guess you are trying to emphasize the strong beats behind
5. 01:15:397 (1,3,5) - they should be added cymbal sounds on them and the slider head, which is consistent with what you did in 01:05:700 (1,2,3) -
6. 01:26:912 (3) - hmm, a blanket?

Normal

• Dx I feel this normal is quite hard

1. 00:08:882 (4,5) - Since it is an intro part, current placement isnt fit really well here. So I guess this one would be easier and matches with the song, what do you say?
   
2. 00:22:064 (1) - I'd change this in to a short reverse-slider which is same as what you did in 00:24:488 (1,2) -
3. 00:30:246 (2,3) - same as above. For here, you just need to Ctrl+G and it would fix the rhythm pattern
4. 01:06:912 (4,5,6,7,8) - I am doubtful about the readability for Normal players here ;w;
5. 01:31:761 (6,7) - use a short reverse-slider to cover the drum hit in 01:31:912 - as well

1. 00:17:821 (2,4) - on purpose? if not I suggest stack with the sliders end should be better
   
   Picture

   
2. 00:20:700 (3) - since you didnt add notes on the blue tick between 00:22:973 (3,4) - , I would say remove this note to keep consistency.However there is a beat on blue ticks but you wont make the normal too hard right:3
   
3. 00:24:488 (1,2,3,4,5) - this sounds weired. try this it fits vocal
   
   Picture

   
4. 00:38:427 (5) - change this to a note? 00:38:730 there is kind overmapped for a low diff
   
5. 00:54:639 (3,1) - i dont know if this is matter or not..but kinda overlap
   
6. 01:06:912 (4,5,6,7) - looks very hard for a normal...but i am not sure of this so nvm

1. 00:04:791 (4) - i suggest remove this to make the lowest diff much more friendly to niwbies
   
2. 00:23:579 (2) - ^
   
3. 00:42:670 (3) - change to a 1/1 slider?
   
4. 00:48:730 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - change to this?
   
   Picture

   

1. Unrankable Issue/Highly Suggested
2. Comment/Minor

1. I don't understand your Hitsounding in the Section starting at 00:09:942 - due to the placement of the claps. If we take a look at them, we can see that you've placed them on every second white tick which has such a clap-ish sound in the music. But listening further to the music shows that the foruth white tick has basically the same sound on it which makes it feel undermphasized due to the missing claps. And then again you've placed a clap at 00:19:033 (3) - which now feels kinda sudden even though the music is forming a build-up to the new section. Therefore please put claps at 00:11:761 - , 00:14:185 (4) - and 00:16:609 - .
2. 00:05:094 (1,2,3) - This flows pretty harsh if you ask me. The hole movement feels crumpled and doesn't give they player a good range to aim this. Something like this would play much smoother.
3. 00:17:215 (1) - I guess you want some variety in rhythm but you've always mapped the clap at 00:17:821 - which is fairly strong sou it sounds kinda weird to ignore this here imo :/ I'd go for something like this or something similiar to what you've done before.
4. 00:42:670 (3) - The flow from the previous object into this feels slightly forced which is a result of the direction the Slider is curved into. I know this is symmetrical but a -45° rotation would play much better. If you want to keep the pattern symmetrical either this or this works well (:
5. 00:49:336 (3,4,1) - Please, what happened here? This looks a bit untidy and could be much cleaner by just reusing the previous objects positions o-o Example
6. 00:56:003 (1) - /Minor/ - Try to place this at 248|198 to tidy up the pattern a bit as you're avoiding the overlap with 00:53:882 (1) - .
7. Well, overall the diff needs more pattern fixes and some tidying for patterns like 01:12:064 (2,1) - . Try to look over the diff again and clean it a bit more up! (Especially the last two sections or so, the early ones are rather tidy which makes the appearance get less appealing while the map progresses imo)

1. Same as I've said in Easy about that Hitsounding applies here as well.
2. Do I have to like the rhythm like 01:28:730 (3) - for instance? If we compare it to almost continuous 1/4 in the Hard this feels a bit underdone and tbh, I feel like the blue tick the repeat is on isn't such an important tick :/ Rhythm like this supports the music so much better and the density shouldn't be a problem as well as it 1. is the kiai and 2. that wouldn't even be denser than the rest. This needs some rework if you ask me. (Something like 01:18:427 (3,4,5) - works pretty nice as well imo :>)
3. 00:04:488 (4) - Well, I personally dislike this rhythm as it feels quite unintuitive to ignore that rather strong red tick by mapping the weaker blue tick. This can also be a struggle for newbie players as it isn't the most dominant and obvious rhythm here imo. Therefore either shorten the Slider to 1/2 or try this. (Also you've ignored a rather similiar blue tick at 00:07:367 - which makes it also feel inconsistent since if you listen there's a triplet played by the same instrument here as well).
4. 00:29:336 (1,3) - This overlap here looks quite confusing which might kicks some newbie players off due to a harsh readability. Something like this would be neat if you ask me! (:
5. 00:44:488 (2,3) - Not sure if this is intended to be a simplification of the rhythm but as the note on the red tick is so strong, it can't be ignored imo. I mean, the drums as well as the vocals clearely hit the red tick stronger than the blue one and then form a triplet to the downbeat. This feels so much more natural to me :<
6. 00:48:124 (4) - Consider to move this 1/4 backwards. I don't know if it's just me but the vocals as well as the note on the blue tick following this 1/2 Slider is the note my main focus lays on while playing this which would make this rhythm so much more intuitive for me. (Also it feels quite similiar to 00:49:336 (2,3) - if you ask me o:)
7. 01:02:973 (4) - The Clap here felt okay in Easy as the upbeat has been ignored there but here it feels kinda spammed to me as the tick doesn't really need such an emphasis. A whistle fits much better but that's a matter of taste I guess :3
8. 01:16:003 (2,3,4,5) - Are you really confident about these overlaps? They look rather confusing especially to a newbie I guess o-o Also I've mistaken them for 1/2 which shows how confusing they can be. Try something simpler like this in order to prevent a better readability.
   
9. 01:31:761 (6,1) - What exatcly happened to the DS here? o:
10. The diff needs more polishing imo, especially some patterns in the Kiai. The structure is except some smaller patterns pretty clean though. Good job on this!