1. Onslaught (6.54 stars, 2024 notes)

Yauxo wrote:

■ You maybe want to consider OD 8.5 because of the high BPM and 1/3 1/4 changes
hm the bpm is 219 in the beginning(146 1/3 and 1/6 = 219 1/2 and 1/4) and 210 later so it's not too inconsistent, if more people think it's too high i'll reduce it i guess but for now it's ok
Mazzerin
■ 03:05:739 (14,15,1) - I dont think alternating the spacing here is a good idea. Kinda makes it look like 1 isnt part of the stream
reduced the spacing a bit
■ 03:08:453 (2) - 03:13:024 (2) - 03:26:739 (2) - 03:31:310 (2) - Move NC to be on the first streamy note (downbeat + helps to read the circle before that)
very true
■ 03:48:024 (8,9,10) - 03:49:167 (8,9,10) - 03:50:310 (8,9,10) - I dont think a random "stack" like that fits in here. Some more spacing here would do well imo.
very true
■ 04:10:024 (9,10,1) - same as similar above. Maybe you want to add more spacing the the triplet in general as opposed to the random increased spacing of the last note
it's ok like this nothing unreadable
■ Now, here is something that bugs me: This here is 1/2 spacing, it has a little break inbetween 04:08:167 (3,4) -
Then, this here is 1/4 spacing, it has no break inbetween 03:37:953 (4,1) -
Both examples use pretty much the same spacing and combotype and there is basically no way of telling that either a or b is different to another, other than by approach circle or knowing the song. You maybe want to space things like 04:08:167 (3,4) - further away
it plays the same way if its 1/4 after a slider, i wanted it to look nice by having it next to each other on the 1/2 part but i spaced it out anyways rip
■ 04:33:096 (1) - This Slider should start 1/4 tick earlier (where 04:33:024 (3) - is)
very true

x-treme wrote:

Your mp3 has a bit rate of 320kbps, which is too high. Here's an mp3 with a bit rate of 192 kbps: http://puu.sh/g10hZ/f1d0754b0d.mp3

deetz wrote:

mazzerin:
02:51:310 (1,2) - I'll only point this out once cuz you do it a lot. 1.0x spacing = same movement speed required as the sliders move, so making the spacing between these sliders less than 1.0x creates weird stop and start motion, which is especially odd at a bpm like this. so just space them at least 1.0x apart
uh it doesn't feel bad at all especially when there's low spacing only between 1/4s which are sliders, if more people think it's awful i'll consider changing i guess
02:54:739 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - please increase spacing looks funny right after the big jumps. it'll be far more fun with bigger spacing. this works 02:50:167 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
very true
03:08:310 (5,1) - 03:12:882 (5,1) - 03:26:596 (5,1) - etc. etc. I don't think these stacks work out so well, they're not fun to read or play and you force the player to stop for no real reason
ok moved the notes on top of the 5 note stacks to the sides so you don't have to stop for too long
03:17:596 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same as before with spacing, pls increase
very true
03:35:882 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ and there's even slight overlaps too which look really meh
very true
04:00:024 (2) - somewhere around here would be cooler https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2791550
why not
04:10:096 (10,1) - kind of painful at this bpm but up to you i guess
pain is good
04:24:167 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ok please make this a lot bigger, it's kind of annoying and unfun to play like this with the overlaps. you could also do straight lines
very true
04:47:882 (1) - exaggerate the shape more https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2791556
why not
05:11:667 (3,4,5,1) - I only hear a triple in the music
there are snare drums on blue ticks and some guitar things on the other ones
05:22:096 (4,1) - custom stack 4 and 1 on 2, it's more natural to play https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2791563
but theres a snare drum on blue tick and the guitar shred starts on white tick
05:23:596 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - at this bpm? ;_; please don't
oh yes

plz rank
yes

Fort wrote:

you requested M4M in pm in-game

03:04:167 (3,4,5) - why not stacking this notes?
CAUSE IT LOOKS COOL and makes no difference in playing
02:56:739 (4) - NC this, keep some consistency from your previous NCs
but it's the same measure with 4 of those symphonic sound things just that i mapped drums instead of the 4th sound thing
03:00:739 (2) - why no use 3/4 slider? that one looks funny i think lol (then you can remove NC here 03:01:024 (1) - )
very true, i'll stick to them being consistently 3/4
03:05:382 (10,11,12,13) - this stream have low sound, its like overmap (i suggest you end your stream in 03:05:310 - , then add 5s in 03:05:596 - )
but it is clearly audible o.O
03:05:310 (9) - NC here (because of some strong sound in there)
why not
03:23:596 (2,2) - pffft, again? its okay if you think that will be good :3
very true
03:37:810 (2,3,4) - delete 3, move slider 4 to 03:37:882 -, after that add reverse slider on that slider
ok
03:40:524 (2) - better do circle stream than like this (or add circle in 03:40:524 - and move slider to 03:40:596 - , then remove 1 reverse arrow in your slider)
ok changed to the 2nd suggestion
03:46:739 (1,2,3) - make this pattern same like 03:37:596 (1,2,3) -
it already is like that one now but shorter reverse slider and 3/4 slider before the burst because there's no extra note on the blue tick on this burst
03:51:882 - oh god, this streams can hurt people hands, incredible
yes
04:10:024 (9,10,1) - triplet kinda weird spacing
yes because 3rd note is stronk
04:14:167 (1,2,3,4) - better no whistle sound
very true
05:08:167 (1,2,3,4) - you need to make this notes volume loud, its kinda inaudible little bit
changed from 45% to 80% should be good now
05:08:453 - not sure about this part, but why this song have strong beats landed on blue ticks? its kinda weird things (have you try mapping and testplaying this landed on red and white ticks?), but i dont know that part sounds like 05:25:596 -
the problem is that in the 05:08:453 section the snare drums/blast beats whatever are on blue ticks instead of red/white ticks, that's why i focused on them
05:39:310 - oh god, this stream so cool lol
yes

i think that's my tell, why pishifat's mapping part so good?
he is cat

good luck!
thx

robby250 wrote:

The chart complements the music very well and it's one of the most epic beatmaps I've played. I'd mod but I've never modded before so idk how.

Cheers for making metal beatmaps though. It's nice to take a break from weeaboo trash once in a while.

Chloe wrote:

05:39:310 (1) - should set streams of spacing equal or bigger than fdfd's last part.

handsome wrote:

hello

02:51:596 (2,3,4,1) - apart from what deetz said about these sliders, the movement and flow just feels a bit too out of place. i suggested keeping these regular long sliders. here's why: http://i.imgur.com/N9B8lyd.jpg red dictates sliderball movement and green is the cursor movement of most people. i suggest maybe something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2820500 where there is plenty of cursor movement. alternatively, you can shorten these to 1/2 sliders to better accentuate the sound on the redticks. then you can even convert 02:52:167 (4) - into a stream.
changed to 3 3/4 sliders with bigger spacing+that stream thing you suggested
02:55:882 (1,2,3) - same thing here, although more appropriately executed with hold-move-hold.
y
03:04:167 (3,4) - ?
whatever changed into stack
04:10:024 (9,10) - i know your intention but this just isn't cool on a triple.
changed it to 03:05:739 (6,7,1) - spacing since no one complained about that
04:53:024 (1) - ugly, whenever your slider isn't a regular curve one, use minimum 2 grey points for a nicer curve. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2820523
oki
05:06:739 (6) - split into 2 repeats or nc, you have 2 repeats that repeat a different number of times for the same combo, might get confusing.
ok ncd
05:17:024 (1,2) - doesn't fit
moved
05:22:096 (4,1) - this isnt cool
IT IS COOL IT IS IT IS I SWEAR IT IS
05:25:024 (1) - i think it'll be better if you kept the stream equal DS from here since it isn't really a gradual change but a sudden one
ok
05:47:739 (11,1) - 05:46:024 (11,1) - its weird how the jumps between your streams vary so much evern tho they're all 1/2
derp literally never thought about the spacing between them made it normal
early on, the pattern could be organized much better. gets better later on but i still think there room for improvement. some empty triples here and there.
yea pishi remap pls nob
otherwise good map.
THANKS

Chloe wrote:

hi m4m

04:47:882 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - a lots of normal stream spam here, could be more sence, you can see some patterns in kloyd/tsuka/skystar's maps
changed the spacing a bit and the curves of the triples dont really know what you mean by sence
05:11:667 (3) - i just don't know why you use the smallest spacing in the most crazy part lol, plz increase and kill players
SURE
05:39:310 (1) - should set streams of spacing equal or bigger than fdfd's last part.
i talked to evilelvis and some other guys about it and they said its fine like it is now i think so too

gl, nice hs work tanks

handsome wrote:

05:52:382 (4) - ?