This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2016年7月23日 at 23:07:58

Artist: Mitsuki Kotono
Title: Fuyu ni Saku Hana
Source: 彼女のセイイキ
Tags: Taiko feng9th Visual Novel Kanojo no Seiiki Sanctuary Opening
BPM: 170
Filesize: 7753kb
Play Time: 04:41
Difficulties Available:

1. Futsuu (2.17 stars, 651 notes)
2. Kantan (1.46 stars, 381 notes)
3. Muzukashii (3.2 stars, 1059 notes)
4. Oni (4.07 stars, 1347 notes)

Download: Mitsuki Kotono - Fuyu ni Saku Hana
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
#19 - Taiko mapset
BG - 100%
Kantan - 100%
Futsuu - 100%
Muzukashii - 100%
Oni - 100%

First e.e
from M4M

[Oni]

1. 00:18:881 this could be kat
2. 00:19:058 this too
3. 00:22:058 maybe don here is better
4. 00:26:999 you could delete this note, imo, it doesn't have anything to do there
5. 00:28:234 ^
6. 00:33:528 this could be don
7. 00:36:705 maybe kat
8. 00:39:234 don too
9. 00:53:646 don? 00:53:823 DON
10. 00:55:146 delete:3
11. 00:55:234 ^
12. 01:03:175 this could be don
13. 01:08:911 ^
14. 01:17:647 these 3 notes don't sound good
15. 01:22:941 d k d sounds better
16. 02:40:411 ain't agree with these 3 notes, they don't look good, you could change
17. 02:53:647 this sounds overmapped
18. 03:52:058 - 03:54:528 i don't know about this part, doesn't sound good to me
    
    [Muzukashii]
    01:44:646 I still haven't found any error
19. 02:23:470 - 02:24:175 you ALWAYS follow the singer but in this part you follow the rhythm and the drums, it could confuse "muzukashii players", this should be changed
20. 03:45:352 (830) here, 03:45:617 (831) here and 03:45:881 (832) here
21. 04:16:764 - 04:22:764 I don't know if you're followin' the rhythm and the drums or the voice, should be changed
    
    [Kantan]
22. 00:31:940 this should be k
23. 00:39:352 you should a k here
24. 00:50:646 maybe add a d here
25. 02:28:411 maybe add a d here, sounds so dead D:
26. 02:39:528 should be here the following k
27. 03:57:352 (315, 316, 317) these notes sounds rare

In general your diff are really good, mostly I gave recommendations.
See you, I hope it helps you, so please tell me what you have used

ThoomyyxD wrote:

First e.e
from M4M

[Oni]

1. 00:18:881 this could be kat As vocal pitch is lower than 00:18:352 (50) - and is the same as 00:19:058 (52) - , d would be fine.
2. 00:19:058 this too same as ^
3. 00:22:058 maybe don here is better fixed
4. 00:26:999 you could delete this note, imo, it doesn't have anything to do there I followed the instrument there.
5. 00:28:234 ^ same as ^
6. 00:33:528 this could be don Retained to fit the snare sound.
7. 00:36:705 maybe kat d would result in a better flow imo.
8. 00:39:234 don too same as 00:33:528 -
9. 00:53:646 don? 00:53:823 DON k d would match the pitch of violin; there is no stressed sound to map with.
10. 00:55:146 delete:3 Remain unchanged for reasonable complexity.
11. 00:55:234 ^ ^
12. 01:03:175 this could be don I think this would worsen the overall flow.
13. 01:08:911 ^ same as 00:33:528 -
14. 01:17:647 these 3 notes don't sound good Why?
15. 01:22:941 d k d sounds better k d K could accompany the high-pitched vocal well.
16. 02:40:411 ain't agree with these 3 notes, they don't look good, you could change Why?
17. 02:53:647 this sounds overmapped same as 01:17:647 -
18. 03:52:058 - 03:54:528 i don't know about this part, doesn't sound good to me Any suggestions?
    
    [Muzukashii]
    01:44:646 I still haven't found any error
19. 02:23:470 - 02:24:175 you ALWAYS follow the singer but in this part you follow the rhythm and the drums, it could confuse "muzukashii players", this should be changed Nope, I followed both vocal and drums in this map.
20. 03:45:352 (830) here, 03:45:617 (831) here and 03:45:881 (832) here The triangle is more prominent here.
21. 04:16:764 - 04:22:764 I don't know if you're followin' the rhythm and the drums or the voice, should be changed same as 02:23:470 - 02:24:175 -
    
    [Kantan]
22. 00:31:940 this should be k Remain unchanged in contrast to 00:29:117 -
23. 00:39:352 you should a k here Retained for a better spread with Futsuu.
24. 00:50:646 maybe add a d here It would be a bit demanding for beginners.
25. 02:28:411 maybe add a d here, sounds so dead D: The break here is intentional to match the long stretches of vocal.
26. 02:39:528 should be here the following k No change here for simplicity.
27. 03:57:352 (315, 316, 317) these notes sounds rare The rhythm is rare as well.

In general your diff are really good, mostly I gave recommendations.
See you, I hope it helps you, so please tell me what you have used

Thanks for the mod~

Take a star for it!

Hello so mod as your request! Here we go:



Good luck, solid map!

mintong89 wrote:

Hello so mod as your request! Here we go:

[General]
You're not gonna make a Inner Oni? There's a lot of inst or beat that you didn't map at Oni in my option. ok maybe not lol I think the Oni is already dense enough lol

[Oni]

00:10:764 (30) - k here? to keep the white line as k just like 00:10:411 (27,32) - these two. Hmm... I think d here would result in a smoother flow.
00:11:470 - Consider decrease the hitsound volume? Imo it still too loud for vocal lol. changed from 50% to 40%
00:16:764 (44) - k this for make the difference of tone? fixed
00:19:058 (52) - Same as above. The pitch is the same as 00:18:881 (51) -
00:30:528 (85) - k here too just like you do at 00:29:823 (83) - here. I mapped 00:29:823 (83) - as k because of the noticeable background instrument there.
00:38:293 (132) - k here to emphasize the drum tick? Remain unchanged so the big kat at 00:38:646 (134) - could be emphasized more.
00:44:823 - I feel current pattern is weird because of sudden blue tick pattern, how about add a note at here? (Or if you wanna keep break from big note, then I think it would be better just delete that blue tick note.) The blue tick note is mapped for the vocal, while the 3/4 break would help reflect the snapping.
00:58:764 - => 00:59:293 - Because you've follow the vocal from beginning to here all time, it might be weird if you just follow drum at here. Change to the pattern that follow vocal? fixed
01:47:470 - Same as above, it's still too loud for vocal. ^
02:04:940 - It would be better you just add a note at here, because the guitar bass is quite loud here. ^
02:21:881 (641) - k here for symmetry for next two note? (k d then d k.) As the vocal pitch here is the same as 02:22:058 (642) - , d would be fine.
02:33:881 (708) - Maybe you missed a big note here? No, the sound is not strong enough for a big note and I don't use one at 00:57:881 (241) - as well.
02:40:323 - => 02:40:587 - Actually it sound have kdkd at here if you hear song drum properly just like you do it at first part chorus. So add this pattern then delete 02:40:234 (748) - this note? I don't use the kdkd pattern because the vocal here is a way more powerful.
03:34:764 - And here too, it's too loud. fixed

[Muzukashii]

01:03:881 - => 01:04:234 - Why there's so long break here lol. Same as next same pattern. I use a long 5/2 break here because the pattern chain is rather long from 00:48:175 to 01:36:175 - . Also, it could follow the vocal pause nicely.
Meiyoule

[Futsuu]
Fine.

[Kantan]
Fine.

Good luck, solid map!

Thanks for your mod mintong~

Modding for nardo's MAP D




Sorry that I am not good at mapping the diff of Kantan and Futsuu. Therefore, I dont know how to give any good improvement suggestions for Kantan.
Besides, the mod for Futsuu diff are just following my personal feeling. Some bad advice may be given. If the mod are useless, you can reject all of them XD
Good Luck

,

ll-oscar wrote:

Modding for nardo's MAP D

Oni

00:05:823 (5) - to 00:11:470 (37) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4643042, this structure may better to show the progressive drum hit sound Somehow I found your suggested part from 00:05:823 to 00:08:293 - a bit unnatural to me, so I would like to keep mine at the moment.
00:18:881 (54) - d to k?, seems high pitch for vocal Its pitch is the same as 00:19:058 (52) - , so d would be fine.
00:35:293 (117) - d to k, high pitch too? :3 As the vocal pitch here is lower than 00:35:117 (113) - , it is possible to use d.
00:35:470 - add d and del 00:35:646 (118) - , stop here may better for me Retained for better coherence of pattern strands. If you pay attention to the pauses, you will notice that I usually put them on the places where vocal ends.
00:45:087 - del k?, too strange if mix the vocal and drum sound as dkkddk I prefer combining vocal and drums when the music becomes denser as this could produce a greater impact.
01:22:234 - add d, same pattern as 00:59:646 (250) - The vocal pattern here is a bit different from the previous one, so as the notes and choice of breaks.
02:10:940 (575) - del d, BG sound is softer here and can have less notes Nope, the vocal there seems to be important as well.
02:15:175 (603,604,605,606,607,608,609) - ddkdkkd -> d dkddk, this seems better for me This would be a bit undermapped in my opinion.
02:58:234 - add d , same reason as 01:22:234 - same as before
03:10:764 (928) - hitsound volume can be lower? fixed
03:31:940 (1007,1008,1009,1010,1011,1012,1013,1014) - D kkk d kkk -> K ddd k ddd, Mitch to the song more for me No change here as kkk would fit the snares well.
03:45:352 (1043,1044,1045,1046) - d kdk -> k kkk, the instrument sound kdk is very small. And i think here can follow a pattern with same pitches. Therefore, kkk is used here for me. Remain unchanged to make it consistent with Muzukashii.
03:57:528 - add d, drum sound here Keeping a break there would result in a greater impact of the big kat at 03:57:705 -
03:59:381 - add k, same as other kiai part (02:26:205 (660) - and 00:50:205 (194) - ) fixed
04:08:823 - add d, same as 01:22:234 - same as before
04:10:764 (1190,1191,1192) - d k d -> dd kd, better to me Nope, it sounds rather unnatural to me.
04:23:293 (1274,1275) - change to kk? slightly high pitch than 04:23:999 (1276,1277) - fixed

Muzukashii

00:07:587 (8) - k -> d, low pitch BG sound No, the pitch here is higher than that at 00:07:234 -
00:07:940 (9) - d -> k , high pitch ~.~ Compared to 00:08:293 - , its pitch is lower.
00:18:881 (42) - same reason as Oni same as Oni
00:54:440 (181) - del d?, sounds not very mitch to use 1/4 pattern Retained for a better spread with Oni.
01:03:881 - add d k, BG sound have ddk and just add d k due to diff of muzu is lower. If nothing here is a little bit strange The 5/2 break here is essential because of the neighbouring dense patterns.
01:17:028 (285) - del too :3 (00:54:440 - ) same as 00:54:440 (181) -
02:30:440 (548) - same as 00:54:440 - and 01:17:028 (285) - ^
02:39:881 - add d k, reason as 01:03:881 - same as 01:03:881 -
04:15:528 - del d? better structure of K d d K d K d k d d k rather than K d d K d K d d K d k (https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4643198) No change here to keep the d K d d K consistent with 04:17:999 and 04:20:823 -
04:29:734 - kkk -> k K or k k, i may refer to this two patterns Retained for a better spread with Oni.
04:33:528 - add d, strong drum sound The drum sounds are actually snapped as 1/3, but I would prefer keeping this part simple.
The following parts are fine in Muzukashii

Futsuu

00:30:528 (45,46,47,48) - d d d k -> d d d k, sound better if same notes pattern as 00:31:940 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56) - ( not included notes color) Hmm what do you mean?
00:34:587 (58) - del d and add d at 00:35:470 - Remain unchanged to accompany the vocal.
00:35:823 - add k, vocal seems important here There is no vocal at this point...
00:36:175 - add d, better connective feel (連繫感:3) It's a good idea, but I would like to keep this part blank to focus on the vocal solely.
00:52:058 - add k K? strong drum beat No change here owing to difficulty concern.
00:57:705 - add d D, mitch pattern with 00:52:234 - but used D same as ^
01:03:175 (137) - d -> k, vocal high pitch? Nope, the vocal at 01:03:528 - is much stronger, so d here would help emphasize that.
01:08:470 - add d, sounds better Again, the 2/1 break here is important.
01:14:823 - same as 00:52:058 - same as before
01:20:470 - same as 00:57:705 - ^
**************************************************************************
00:52:058 - , 00:57:705 - , 01:14:823 - ,01:20:470 - those suggestions are given for all kiai I may reconsider this later.
**************************************************************************
03:08:823 - use d d d k d (https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4643252) Retained for a more balanced spread from Kantan to Muzukashii.
03:22:411 (475,476,477,478) - d d k d -> d k d d, same reason as 00:30:528 (45,46,47,48) - I think ddk d would result in a smoother flow.
04:35:117 (652) - del d, mitch with 04:34:411 - , nothing between k k is better same reason as 03:08:823 -

Kantan

Seems fine.

Sorry that I am not good at mapping the diff of Kantan and Futsuu. Therefore, I dont know how to give any good improvement suggestions for Kantan.
Besides, the mod for Futsuu diff are just following my personal feeling. Some bad advice may be given. If the mod are useless, you can reject all of them XD

Thanks for your mod~

Sorry late ;__;


[ General]

1. Okay.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Kantan]

1. fine

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Futsuu]

1. fine

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:44:999 (142) - Delete ? ( have drum sound but little easier. )
   
   
2. 01:27:175 (332) - delete ? ( follow vocal -> delete. / follow other -> put :3 )
   
   
3. 02:20:999 (508) - some 00:44:999 (142) -
   
   
4. 03:22:587 (759) - move 03:22:234 (758) - & change kat ? ( better I think _(:3JL )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Oni]

1. fine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stable, high-quality map.

toara_fict wrote:

Sorry late ;__;


[ General]

1. Okay.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Kantan]

1. fine

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Futsuu]

1. fine

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:44:999 (142) - Delete ? ( have drum sound but little easier. ) Since Oni is quite hard at this point, it would be better to keep the note.
   
   
2. 01:27:175 (332) - delete ? ( follow vocal -> delete. / follow other -> put :3 ) fixed :3
   
   
3. 02:20:999 (508) - some 00:44:999 (142) - same as 00:44:999 (142) -
   
   
4. 03:22:587 (759) - move 03:22:234 (758) - & change kat ? ( better I think _(:3JL ) fixed

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[ Oni]

1. fine.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stable, high-quality map.

Thanks for your mod toara~

Hi~ From my Queue


I think very enjoyable map XD

Good luck~

nyanmi-1828 wrote:

Hi~ From my Queue

Oni

00:26:999 - Delete for the follow vocal The piano is so significant that it could not be ignored imo.
01:15:970 - d I think better(*´ω｀*) I think k would fit the snare better.
02:02:999 - Delete for the follow vocal fixed
02:51:705(818,819,820,821,822,823,824) - kkddkkk same as 01:15:970 -

I think very enjoyable map XD

Good luck~

Thanks for your mod~

Hi Nardo~

• d=Don
  D=Big Don
  k=Katsu
  K=Big Katsu

[General]

• 
  I detected that the note of 01:30:529 (120) - in Kantan is a bit unsnapped, you can notice that if you try to move the note a bit, also, in muzukashii in 02:55:059 (661) - too, so, i suggest an autosnap in all diffs

[Kantan]

• 
  00:20:646 (18,19) - control+g here? d d k fits good with piano + vocal imo
  01:30:529 (120) - change this note to d? follows the drum and i think fits with the vocal too
  03:20:293 (264) - change this note to d? d d K seems less tricky to hit than d k K for new players, also, follows drums too
  04:22:764 (353) - same as 01:30:529 (120) - , change this note to d?

[Futsuu]

• 
  00:20:646 (29,30,31) - if you accepted the suggestion of kantan change this pattern to ddk or kdk? (or kkd if you not accepted the suggestion of kantan)
  01:30:352 (209,210) - control+g here? kkd fits good too imo and follows drum too
  03:19:234 (460,461,462,463,464) - change this pattern to kkddk? sounds good imo
  04:22:412 (612,613,614) - same as before, change to kkd?

[Muzukashii]

• 
  01:19:059 (295) - change this note to k? fits good with vocals imo
  01:47:470 (393) - change this note to k? fits good with the vocal imo
  02:55:058 (661) - same here, change this note to k?

[Oni]

• 01:19:059 (371) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k?
  01:29:999 (432,433,434,435,436,437,438) - i don't know if you will accept due to it's an oni and a easier pattern it's better, but how about change this to ddkkdkd? fits good imo
  01:47:470 (497) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k?
  02:55:059 (844) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k?
  03:18:352 (943,944,945) - change this note to k? kkk fits better imo, if you accepted change 03:18:528 (744) - of muzukashii to k too
  04:22:234 (1267,1268,1269,1270,1271,1272,1273) - same as before? change this pattern to ddkkdkd?

That's all, nice map! and sorry if my mod didn't helped, good luck!

Hanjamon wrote:

Hi Nardo~

• d=Don
  D=Big Don
  k=Katsu
  K=Big Katsu

[General]

• 
  I detected that the note of 01:30:529 (120) - in Kantan is a bit unsnapped, you can notice that if you try to move the note a bit, also, in muzukashii in 02:55:059 (661) - too, so, i suggest an autosnap in all diffs fixed

[Kantan]

• 
  00:20:646 (18,19) - control+g here? d d k fits good with piano + vocal imo I think k d would fit the pitch decrease of piano in a way better.
  01:30:529 (120) - change this note to d? follows the drum and i think fits with the vocal too As the vocal pitch is high here, it would sound more natural to use k.
  03:20:293 (264) - change this note to d? d d K seems less tricky to hit than d k K for new players, also, follows drums too Retained to follow the snare using k.
  04:22:764 (353) - same as 01:30:529 (120) - , change this note to d? same as 01:30:529 (120) -

[Futsuu]

• 
  00:20:646 (29,30,31) - if you accepted the suggestion of kantan change this pattern to ddk or kdk? (or kkd if you not accepted the suggestion of kantan) I think d could suit the pitch trend of the piano more smoothly.
  01:30:352 (209,210) - control+g here? kkd fits good too imo and follows drum too refer to Kantan
  03:19:234 (460,461,462,463,464) - change this pattern to kkddk? sounds good imo same as ^
  04:22:412 (612,613,614) - same as before, change to kkd? ^

[Muzukashii]

• 
  01:19:059 (295) - change this note to k? fits good with vocals imo fixed
  01:47:470 (393) - change this note to k? fits good with the vocal imo Remain unchanged for pattern consistency as 00:11:470 -
  02:55:058 (661) - same here, change this note to k? fixed

[Oni]

• 01:19:059 (371) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k? fixed
  01:29:999 (432,433,434,435,436,437,438) - i don't know if you will accept due to it's an oni and a easier pattern it's better, but how about change this to ddkkdkd? fits good imo refer to Kantan
  01:47:470 (497) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k? same as Muzukashii
  02:55:059 (844) - same as muzukashii, change this note to k? fixed
  03:18:352 (943,944,945) - change this note to k? kkk fits better imo, if you accepted change 03:18:528 (744) - of muzukashii to k too The pitch becomes lower compared to 03:17:823 - , so d would be fine.
  04:22:234 (1267,1268,1269,1270,1271,1272,1273) - same as before? change this pattern to ddkkdkd? refer to Kantan

That's all, nice map! and sorry if my mod didn't helped, good luck!

Thanks for your mod Hanjamon~

[Muzukashii]

1. OD 5 I highly recommend OD 5, as 4 remains much too forgiving for a diff meant for players that aren't very new anymore.
   
2. 04:17:646 (976) - This is the only big note during this ending part that is D and not K, if that matters to you.

[Kantan]

1. Despite the length of the song, HP4 still seems too easy to pass. If you prefer that, it's fine.

OzzyOzrock wrote:

[Muzukashii]

1. OD 5 I highly recommend OD 5, as 4 remains much too forgiving for a diff meant for players that aren't very new anymore. used 4.5 instead to keep it lower than Oni.
   
2. 04:17:646 (976) - This is the only big note during this ending part that is D and not K, if that matters to you. Oni has the same big note distribution, so I guess it would be okay.

[Kantan]

1. Despite the length of the song, HP4 still seems too easy to pass. If you prefer that, it's fine. changed HP to 5.

Thanks for your mod Ozzy~

15 seconds away from JUSTICE...

Bubbled!

weff

[General]

The volume change 04:37:587 - here should start slightly later so it only affects the spinner, feels to me like the note deserves to be loud and powerful as it is the end.

kiai could be 95 or 100% imo

[Kantan]

01:09:705 - to 01:10:411 - maybe you can add one or two more notes here, this section has way more notes in the higher diffs. It's quite similar to 00:32:646 -
01:26:999 - hm, feels like at least here there could be one more note because the song feels very intense here.

02:45:705 - 03:02:999 - 04:13:587 - repeat

[Futsuu]

HP could be 5 one more time, it's not too harsh with this amount of notes yet.

01:09:528 (153) - Move it 01:08:470 - here, it feels quite strange that suddenly the drums have a little bit more notes mapped compared to vocals.
02:45:528 (381) - ^
03:32:823 (497,498,499,500) - A big note after 3 1/2 notes seems rather harsh to me for a Futsuu. Would remove the don (also note I mentioned something here for Muzu below)

[Muzukashii]

OD should be 5.

00:54:352 (180,181) - Instead of having this 1/4 triplet (which is not present 00:48:705 - here) you could maybe follow the vocals 00:57:175 - here?
> 01:16:940 (284,285) - 02:30:352 (546,547) - ^ 02:52:940 - wat there's no triplet here 04:03:528 (908,909,910) - ^
01:14:117 (270,271,272,273,274) - does this use a completely different from 00:51:617 (167,168,169) - on purpose?
> 02:50:293 (639,640,641) - 04:00:705 (894,895,896,897) - ^
02:55:940 (664,665,666) - Let the triplet start 02:55:764 - here instead for vocals, remove 02:56:028 (665) -
> 04:06:528 (922,923,924) - ^
03:32:470 (801) - Could be finisher but it's a little bit understandable why it's not.
03:32:823 (802,803,804) - Snares are 1/2 in the song here so maybe do 1/2.

[Oni]

OD could be 5.5 or 6.

02:04:058 - Could increase the volume of these kats a little bit, maybe go 50-60-70 on them (Muzukashii too, i sorry)

00:45:087 (170) - Don might play nicer
> 02:21:087 (636) - ^
00:58:940 (246,247,248,249) - drums are pretty much like 01:10:234 (316,317,318,319,320) - so you could have a 5-plet there was well. In fact all upcoming repetitions of this does not use 1/4 doublets so that's one more reason to change this. They mostly use ddkkd.
01:15:793 (348) - Is this note necessary, it kinda covers up the start of the drums 01:15:881 (349,350,351,352,353) - here.
> 02:51:793 (820) - ^
03:32:470 (1011) - Finisher pls thank

ok

Nwolf wrote:

weff

[General]

The volume change 04:37:587 - here should start slightly later so it only affects the spinner, feels to me like the note deserves to be loud and powerful as it is the end. fixed

kiai could be 95 or 100% imo increased the volume to 95%

[Kantan]

01:09:705 - to 01:10:411 - maybe you can add one or two more notes here, this section has way more notes in the higher diffs. It's quite similar to 00:32:646 - fixed
01:26:999 - hm, feels like at least here there could be one more note because the song feels very intense here. Good idea.

02:45:705 - 03:02:999 - 04:13:587 - repeat applied all except 04:13:587 - since the subsequent patterns contain a lot more big notes and varied snaps compared to the first and second kiais. Leaving that blank could allow time for beginners to prepare for the more difficult patterns starting from 04:14:293 -

[Futsuu]

HP could be 5 one more time, it's not too harsh with this amount of notes yet. Alright.

01:09:528 (153) - Move it 01:08:470 - here, it feels quite strange that suddenly the drums have a little bit more notes mapped compared to vocals. This would result in a more consecutive pattern chain from 01:04:411 to 01:14:293 - , which is a bit demanding for Futsuu players.
02:45:528 (381) - ^ same as ^
03:32:823 (497,498,499,500) - A big note after 3 1/2 notes seems rather harsh to me for a Futsuu. Would remove the don (also note I mentioned something here for Muzu below) fixed

[Muzukashii]

OD should be 5. I think 4.5 is hard enough owing to the song length and patterns.

00:54:352 (180,181) - Instead of having this 1/4 triplet (which is not present 00:48:705 - here) you could maybe follow the vocals 00:57:175 - here? The current position would be fine imo as vocals exist too. I do not use a 1/4 triplet at 00:48:705 - but at 00:54:352 - due to the big note at 00:49:411 (158) - . It would result in a more straining pattern right at the start of the kiai.
> 01:16:940 (284,285) - 02:30:352 (546,547) - ^ 02:52:940 - wat there's no triplet here 04:03:528 (908,909,910) - ^ Same as above. There is no triplet at 02:52:940 - owing to the absence of vocals.
01:14:117 (270,271,272,273,274) - does this use a completely different from 00:51:617 (167,168,169) - on purpose? Yes, this is intentional due to the more prominent snares.
> 02:50:293 (639,640,641) - 04:00:705 (894,895,896,897) - ^ same as ^
02:55:940 (664,665,666) - Let the triplet start 02:55:764 - here instead for vocals, remove 02:56:028 (665) - It is a good idea, but I think this would weaken the emphasis of the K at 02:55:587 - ...
> 04:06:528 (922,923,924) - ^ same as ^
03:32:470 (801) - Could be finisher but it's a little bit understandable why it's not. Yep, cymbal sound is absent at this point.
03:32:823 (802,803,804) - Snares are 1/2 in the song here so maybe do 1/2. Hmm... Retained as a difficulty spike since this triplet could cohere with 03:32:117 (798,799,800) - pretty well.

[Oni]

OD could be 5.5 or 6. changed to 5.5

02:04:058 - Could increase the volume of these kats a little bit, maybe go 50-60-70 on them (Muzukashii too, i sorry) added in both diffs.

00:45:087 (170) - Don might play nicer The snares are pretty similar to 00:45:793 and 00:46:499 - , so I would prefer a bit more consistency.
> 02:21:087 (636) - ^ same as ^
00:58:940 (246,247,248,249) - drums are pretty much like 01:10:234 (316,317,318,319,320) - so you could have a 5-plet there was well. In fact all upcoming repetitions of this does not use 1/4 doublets so that's one more reason to change this. They mostly use ddkkd. fixed
01:15:793 (348) - Is this note necessary, it kinda covers up the start of the drums 01:15:881 (349,350,351,352,353) - here. Remain unchanged to cohere with 01:10:323 -
> 02:51:793 (820) - ^ same as ^
03:32:470 (1011) - Finisher pls thank I found it suitable at this level of difficulty. Fixed.

ok

Thanks for your mod Nwolf~

ok have fun gz ~