Kisses wrote:

Special

1. 00:24:410 (1) - NC nah breaks my NC pattern
2. 00:43:077 (2) - ^
3. 00:49:299 (2,4) - blanket these 2?
4. 00:50:187 (4,6) - it would also be nice if these 2 sliders had the same curvature imo https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6674449
5. 01:10:631 (3,4,5) - the stack really breaks down the flow, you didn't even do it for 01:13:298 (3,4,5) but you did it here which I don't understand why. But yh, like I said it, it really does break down the flow to play stacks here especially when the whole map involves you moving your cursor a lot. stacks reset flow, they don't break it // i stacked to emphasize the repetitiveness of the vocals, but eh we'll see if i change it later

Hard

1. Not that I'm one to care too much about hp but you can increase to 4.5/5 given the note density of the map did other things

Normal

1. I think hp 3 is more appropiate
2. 00:13:743 - delete unused timing point
3. 00:20:632 (2) - I strongly suggest to but whistles on these, not only do 00:20:632 (2,3) have the same sound of more or less similar intensity but when you play it you get very little feed back when hitting 00:20:632 (2) so it just feels weird
4. 00:21:965 (4) - ^

ProEzreal wrote:

Hello~ M4M from my queue your queue lol xd

General

1. Just wondering, why don't you ever set a kiai section? i dont like kiai ^^''

Normal

1. 00:34:187 (1) - this nc is inconsistent, this is the 9th beat of the whole combo while you set a nc for every 12 beats. if it is for vocals, i suggest you nc 00:35:521 (3) - here too. you may have to redo the ncs if necessary
2. 00:48:187 (3) - i get that you're following the guitar but i think it would make more sense to follow the piano because it would sound a little more natural. it becomes too hard imo

Hard

1. 00:47:076 (3,4,5) - I think these should be further emphasized since the pitch is rising and transiting to the highlight of the song
2. 00:48:187 (1) - Honestly, I think this breaks all of the tension that has been built up 00:47:076 (3,4,5) - here, i guess it is sorta supposed to but rather than destroying the tension right away, i think it should follow the piano a little more and diminish as it goes and ultimately giving a nice jump to 00:48:855 (1) - i think its a cool contrast, ill think about it tho
3. 01:11:966 (5) - I think making these into 1/2 sliders would be better and would have a proper nc on 01:12:854 - to follow the vocals better fine i think
4. 01:18:188 (1) - Give a little emphasis by adding a slight jump? preferably x:200 y:368 i like where it is rn

Special

1. I want to know why you put new combos for specific parts so I can understand your perception of the song better lol yeah, i tried something new with the NC/placements in this diff, the red ncs are on the more emphasized piano beats, while the dimmed purple colours are on the other less-emphasized beats
2. Since this follows the instrumentals a lot, I think it would be cool if you could make the map reflect to the song a little more by using pitch based distance, almost like text painting except you have to follow the pitch of the instrumentals that's interesting but i kinda placed these patterns in a way that i like already, so maybe ill keep this in mind for the future o3o/
3. 00:15:521 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - idk why all these have different spacing
4. 00:17:076 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think by flipping this whole pattern (ctrl-g) it could follow the pitch of the instrumentals better and create a bigger impact of 00:16:855 (1) - this note which reflects to the low note on the piano because the distance would be increased just like how the pitch of the two notes here 00:16:855 (1,1) - are far apart from each other. and 00:18:188 (1) - this lol lol its ok
5. 00:21:077 (1,2,3,4,5) - this doesnt look straight to me 00:19:743 (1,2,3,4,5) - this too
6. 00:24:410 (2) - another nc? nah
7. 00:42:632 (1) - I'm starting to think this would be better off being the same combo color as 00:42:188 (1) - if you're not going to add a NC on 00:43:077 (2) - red is for emphasis!
8. 01:02:187 (1,2) - eh shouldn't this have the same distance as 00:59:965 (2,3) - this nvm they're all inconsistent anyways which could be confusing imo just a jump for this pattern, its acceptable imo
9. 01:10:631 (3,4) - jumps would be nice

Ill try modding mania lol wwww

ez

1. 00:15:521 (15521|0,15743|1,15965|3,16187|2,16410|0,16632|1) - rather than this pattern, 00:15:521 (15521|2,15743|0,15965|1,16187|2,16410|3,16632|2) - i think this pattern would follow the piano better wrong timestamp? they're the same places
2. 00:21:743 (21743|0,21965|3,22187|2,22187|1) - the continual rising of the pitch makes it feel like 00:21:743 (21743|0,21965|1,22187|3,22187|2) - this would be a pattern that reflects better ^ o.o
3. 00:51:300 (51300|0) - this has a pretty loud sound to it, i think there should be 2 notes
4. 00:57:967 (57967|1) - ^

blueloniess wrote:

[*special]
第一次看到这种单点居多的图...额..给出的建议可能有点water,见谅
00:33:966 (5,1) - 稍微大了一点点,距离放小一些如何,这样可能会突然反应不过来的 感覺越遠越爽w
00:38:187 - 00:39:521 - 这一段跟00:35:521 - 00:36:632 - 这一段一样的,要不要考虑复制然后弄个五角星的跳 我喜歡這樣
00:50:187 (4,6) - 平行吧
00:51:521 (1) - 改成这么一个普通的吧,好看不说也符合你想摆的flow,而且还可以让3包一下1,我觉得还是很不错的,图片加载可能有点慢 改成其他的

00:54:187 (1) - 奇奇怪怪的，做成这样的一个逆向blanket我都觉得好看一点 我喜歡 ;w;

01:13:742 (5,1,2) - 这种可以互相包一下的滑条还是包一下吧，5包2，1包5，balnket还是做稍微好一点 ^

三围改成ar8.2 od8.2 又是一张DT PP神图 大概會改ar吧, 再說

[*水笔摸图结束]
辣鸡麻婆的水摸完成
整体不错的，主难度pp图，应该考虑把ar放低一点，做一个DT
作图水平太高了...orz
求dalao带我飞啊 hao a

Riven wrote:

hi, 2/2m4m from your queue

[Normal]

• 
  nice

[Hard]

1. 00:48:187 (1) - This felt a little out of place. This whole time you have been following the piano and now you ignore them for a random guitar distortion. Also because of that, the build up feels a little weak. I got a dragging sensation from that slider as it were holding me and my cursor back. i think its what makes it stand out tho! we'll see i guess owo
2. 01:12:854 - This feels very powerful and intense to me, like it's asking to be clickable! aaa yeah but ill keep for now /w\

[Special]

1. 00:19:743 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:21:077 (1,2,3,4,5) - sound weird to me rhythmically. Obviously the whole concept is the 1/2 spam but try making 00:19:521 (1) - and 00:20:855 (1) - 1/1 sliders. Fits a lot better in my opinion. i like the circle spam orz
2. 00:24:410 (2) - NC for SV change? It will provide consistency (seeing that you have already NCed 01:09:742 (1) - this slider) and clarity uhh yeah my NC pattern is actually pretty messed up this section but i did it to emphasize the stronger piano beats
3. 00:43:077 (2) - Same reasoning as above.
4. 01:05:742 (5) - And this.
5. 00:25:743 (3) - You could Ctrl + G this to emphasize on the vocals. is fine i think
6. 00:44:855 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Reasoning for the NC spam? c o l o u r s

Good luck! (◕‿◕✿)

-Nya- wrote:

Heya~ M4M here.

General:

1. Why start the Insane and Special at different places than the Normal and Hard? sekai's diff is independent so there's that// i mapped the insane and hard completely differently so i kinda just went with what i felt like

Special:

1. 00:15:521 (1,1,1) –Rather keep the spacings here similar for neatness reasons. And also since the music is the same.
2. 00:17:743 (4,5) –Rather space these out normally? To be consistent with 00:14:855 (3,4,5) – and also cause players might mistake it for a fast triple. nah i like this
3. 00:18:410 (1,2) –This jump is quite big for a calm part of the song. Consider nerfing the jump a bit. err should be ok, ill keep it in mind tho
4. 00:27:521 (4) –Add NC here and remove NC here: 00:27:743 (1) – since the beat on (4) sounds stronger and it’s also the big white tick. you're not wrong but i tried a new NC pattern in this mapu so yea orz
5. 00:30:188 (4) -^, etc.
6. 00:30:632 (2,3,4,5) –Make the overlaps look similar for neatness. Right now the overlaps is irregular.
7. 00:41:077 (1) –Place this circle nicely between 00:40:631 (3,4) –
8. 00:47:520 (1,2) –Stacking here would look nicer.
9. 00:47:743 (1,2) –Same as 00:18:410 (1,2) –
10. 00:59:965 (2,3) –Recheck the spacing here. It’s not similar to 00:59:965 (2,3) – Rather make spacings like these similar. wrong timestamp? but i think as long as it's in the general vicinity of similar spacing it should be alright

Hard:

1. HP is too low. Lift it to 5. in terms of spread 2.5 -> 4 -> 5.5 is a lot better imo
2. 00:42:187 (4,5) –The spacing here is a bit too big when comparing it with the rest. Make it similar to 00:40:854 (1,2,3) –
3. 00:44:409 (3,5) –Stack here? Will look neater and also better spacing. small offset for readability imo
4. 00:51:077 (6) –This spacing looks quite big for a Hard and the beat on the head isn’t that strong either. Consider nerfing it a bit.

Normal:
Looks clean~

Good Luck~!

Garden wrote:

sry for delay, been busy with a small tournament recently ;w; np www

Special

1. 00:13:965 - mute volume here like lower diffs?
2. 00:46:632 (2,3) - music here seems to suggest a transition to the chorus part and piano solo becomes vague, having this much spacing is bit too much for me i like how this is designed tho ;w;
3. 00:59:965 (2,3) - 01:01:298 (5,6) - apply same ds to 1/4 gaps for consistency sake? just like 00:55:520 (4,5,6,1) -
   
   i really like how the diff is designed

normal and hard looks fine to me, gl~

UndeadCapulet wrote:

special

1. maybe silence 00:11:577 (1) - 's end since there's no sound for it
2. 00:24:410 (2) - this should probably be horizontal to match the previous sliders, it'd give off the sv change effect better anyway
3. ok so 00:59:520 (1) - this sliderbody doesn't get played through at all with the current arrangement, since the player immediately cuts away to move to the next slider. there are a ton of slight back-and-forth motions throughout 00:58:853 (7,1,1,2) - , to the point that players are going to avoid playing them. this makes your sv changes really weak imo. if you ctrl+g 00:59:076 (1) - players are far more likely to feel like they're fully playing through both sliderbodies, which will make the sv changes feel far more fun and powerful interesting suggestion o.o I'll keep this in mind for now tho o/
4. imo the 01:16:409 (6) - sv drop is really weird since this is just the exact same vocal style as 01:11:076 (5) - , if you were going to do something different anywhere it'd make more sense at 01:13:520 (4,5) - which is much higher pitched i think it leads into the intense jumps kinda like a build-up so yea

really really cool nc and colourhax usage thx!

---

lower diffs are fine
hey gaia :> hihi/