Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

ZARD - Hoshi no Kagayaki Yo

posted
Total Posts
5
deepsea
osu! Alumni
855 posts
Joined April 2008
Topic Starter
deepsea
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2009年2月18日 at 下午 05:22:37

Artist: ZARD
Title: Hoshi no Kagayaki Yo
BPM: 163
Filesize: 5358kb
Play Time: 02:47
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hattori Heiji (4.83 stars, 312 notes)
  2. Kudo Shinichi (4.99 stars, 413 notes)
  3. Mouri Kogoro (3.49 stars, 71 notes)
Download: ZARD - Hoshi no Kagayaki Yo
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Timing unsure.

Thanks kiou2 and alace for timing help.

New dif added.
Last edited by deepsea , edited 2 times in total.
whymeman
osu! Alumni
3,432 posts
Joined November 2008
whymeman
I'm not a pro mapper but i'll try...

The timming seems right, but I got 1,038 for the first offset (see if that works better).

and the 1.80 slider V seems kinda fast for normal (and I noticed hard has it on 2.00), but maybe its just me unless someone says otherwise.
minyeob
osu! Alumni
2,540 posts
Joined May 2008
minyeob
Two Mouri Kogoros??

[Hattori Heiji]
1:11:190 (1)-> Finish.
1:18:622 (1)-> Finish.

[Kudo Shinichi]
1:11:190 (1)-> Finish.
1:18:622 (1)-> Finish.

Most of your hit/slider is technically fine. But some of them are ugly.

Download: miyucherry - Rie Kugimiya - Please Freeze [S i R i R u's Pleasant] (2011-03-05) Osu.osr
deepsea
osu! Alumni
855 posts
Joined April 2008
Topic Starter
deepsea
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Yuukari-Banteki
1,534 posts
Joined June 2008
Yuukari-Banteki
[Mouri Kogoro]
can you space this a bit farther?
01:09:85 (1) - needs to be 1 beat longer


[Hattori Heiji]
HOLY COW THESE SLIDERS ARE FAST
00:16:68 (3) - partly hidden by 1
00:17:60 (4) - new combo?
00:17:97 (6,7,8,9) - stack these more cleanly
00:21:65 (6) - hidden
00:34:35 (6) - new combo?
00:39:50 (1,1) - I don't think this is legal
00:43:92 (3) - stack this more neatly
01:09:29 (6) - new combo?
01:16:93 (2) - stack more cleanly
01:42:04 (7) - new combo?
01:53:45 (9,10) - i dont think this is legal
01:55:29 (6) - new combo?
02:21:04 (7) - ^
02:28:86 (2) - straighten
02:33:52 (1,2,3) - confusing and hides 2 and 3 slightly
02:40:60 (1,1,1,1) - ^
02:47:12 (1) - make this repeat one more time


[Kudo Shinichi]
00:19:44 (17) - combo should not be this long, and can you align the end with the end of 16
00:19:81 (1,2) - ^
00:20:91 (4) - kinda hidden
00:21:83 (1) - make this curve a bit more imo
00:23:86 (6) - ^
00:25:70 (3,4,5,6,7) - ...can you remap this so that it doesn't hide every other note?
00:28:64 (3,4,5,6,7) - ^
00:39:50 (1,1) - illegal?
00:43:92 (3) - stack more neatly
01:03:34 (6) - ^
01:09:32 (6) - ^ + new combo
01:16:93 (2,3,4) - hidden
01:38:36 (5) - stack neatly
01:38:73 (7,8) - straighten
01:41:86 (9) - new combo
01:49:40 (2) - move 1/2 later
01:51:98 (1) - stack
01:55:66 (9) - new combo
02:18:84 (6) - stack
02:18:84 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18) - snap
02:19:39 (10) - new combo
02:26:46 (2,3,4) - hidden
02:36:69 (1,2,3) - stack
02:42:09 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - spacing is a bit too wide here


people will hate that deathstream :D
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 5